On Friday 20 April 2012 Apr, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:35:27 +0200, Jaroslaw Staniek
> wrote:
> > On 19 April 2012 14:18, Inge Wallin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I see this comment a lot, but in practice it's not true. I have never
> >> seen anybody ask "did you once have a good im
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:35:27 +0200, Jaroslaw Staniek
wrote:
> On 19 April 2012 14:18, Inge Wallin wrote:
>>
>>
>> I see this comment a lot, but in practice it's not true. I have never
>> seen anybody ask "did you once have a good implementation of what I am
>> about to do but remove it?" before s
On Thursday 19 April 2012 13:48:52 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so here my list of issues that I have had with ODF so far. Please consider
> putting them on the table for the plugfest as well as for the TC call :)
>
>
> A) no official test suite
> B) spec vs. reality: how to handle
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104677/#review12686
---
You rock! I'm going to try this tomorrow on Linux and on Window
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104677/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Description
---
With gcc 4.7 installed w
On 19 April 2012 14:18, Inge Wallin wrote:
>
>
> I see this comment a lot, but in practice it's not true. I have never seen
> anybody ask "did you once have a good implementation of what I am about to do
> but remove it?" before starting any effort. It just doesn't happen. If you
> go ahead an
Hi,
so here my list of issues that I have had with ODF so far. Please consider
putting them on the table for the plugfest as well as for the TC call :)
A) no official test suite
B) spec vs. reality: how to handle files from broken ODF producers
C) no feedback on office-comment list
D) handling
On Thursday 19 April 2012 12:13:22 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2012, 11:47:55 schrieb Cyrille Berger:
> > Compilations errors are rather big issues, don't you think ;)
>
> Oh, I think those are just overrated ;)
>
> > By looking
> > at
> > the code, I would guess so
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2012, 11:47:55 schrieb Cyrille Berger:
> Compilations errors are rather big issues, don't you think ;)
Oh, I think those are just overrated ;)
> By looking
> at
> the code, I would guess some differences in Qt versions.
I did as well by just looking at the code at line l
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:41:31 +0200, "Friedrich W. H. Kossebau"
wrote:
> If noone feels like being able to join testing of this branch then I
think
> that as I gave all code I touched some brain loops this branch should
just
> be
> commited to master, given the state in the release cycle and that
Only looked at the report designer, thanks for removing my hack :-)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 19/04/2012 2:58 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104666/
Review request for Calligra.
By Friedrich W. H.
On Thursday 19 April 2012 11:26:02 Cyrille Berger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on a once every months (can be adjusted in function of needs or lack
> of needs), until the 2.5
> release which should happen in July (schedule to be established soon):
>
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Rel
Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 19:10:07 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
> Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 18:40:43 schrieb C. Boemann:
> > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 17:38:14 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > my patch to improve the KoUnit API a little and ensure consistent
> > > di
Hi,
Based on a once every months (can be adjusted in function of needs or lack
of needs), until the 2.5
release which should happen in July (schedule to be established soon):
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Release_Plan#Final_release_and_maintenance_schedule
--
Cyrille Berger
__
14 matches
Mail list logo
