On Saturday 14 April 2012 08:37:25 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Thursday 12 Apr 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > Isn't that used as: FEATURE: ?
>
> I had forgotten about that. What about either:
>
> FEATURE/BUG:
> DESCRIPTION: optional description that overide the title from bug (usefull
>
On Thursday 12 Apr 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Isn't that used as: FEATURE: ?
I had forgotten about that. What about either:
FEATURE/BUG:
DESCRIPTION: optional description that overide the title from bug (usefull
when bug report have bad titles like "crash in APPNAME"
Or:
FEATURE/BUG: de
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104560/
---
(Updated April 13, 2012, 5:22 p.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Changes
> On April 13, 2012, 4:56 a.m., Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> > Do you have a screen shot on how the arrows should look like in LO 3.5.
> > Sorry don't have that yet. Maybe you can also mark on what looks wrong in
> > the bug report. I see at least on marker that looks wrong for me.
Don't have 3.
On Friday, April 13, 2012 07:08:03 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was thinking that since calligracommon bugs normally fall outside the
> itches each of us like to scratch the number of bugs in that component
> will just continue to grow
>
> I suggest we organize an online coding sprint where each
