Re: release plan and request for merge

2012-02-24 Thread C. Boemann
On Friday 24 February 2012 18:08:37 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Here is my suggestion: > > * merge the branch ASAP, like this week-end > * tag RC/branch on Friday 2nd > > That way it give use a small week to fully tests the changes before the RC. It has my support __

Re: release plan and request for merge

2012-02-24 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
Here is my suggestion: * merge the branch ASAP, like this week-end * tag RC/branch on Friday 2nd That way it give use a small week to fully tests the changes before the RC. -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org

Re: Review Request: Update block formats on paragraph style change

2012-02-24 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104032/#review10872 --- This review has been submitted with commit d09e90b5163a5193f11

Re: Review Request: Update block formats on paragraph style change

2012-02-24 Thread C. Boemann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104032/#review10871 --- Ship it! Ship It! - C. Boemann On Feb. 24, 2012, 2:22 p.m.,

Re: Review Request: Update block formats on paragraph style change

2012-02-24 Thread Elvis Stansvik
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104032/ --- (Updated Feb. 24, 2012, 2:22 p.m.) Review request for Calligra and C. Boem

Re: Review Request: Update block formats on paragraph style change

2012-02-24 Thread C. Boemann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104032/#review10867 --- Ship it! Looks very nice. Kudos for grasping this complex matt

Re: GSoC idea

2012-02-24 Thread Sebastian Sauer
On 02/24/2012 09:41 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote: On Friday, 2012-02-24, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/23/2012 05:59 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: ** On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote:

Re: Review Request: Undo redo framework for text refactored

2012-02-24 Thread C. Boemann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104047/ --- (Updated Feb. 24, 2012, 12:32 p.m.) Review request for Calligra. Changes

Re: release plan and request for merge

2012-02-24 Thread C. Boemann
On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:57:56 Elvis Stansvik wrote: > 2012/2/23 C. Boemann : > > Hi all > > > > So the minisprint on undo in Words is over and we had success. I'm > > requesting merge of our branch but more on that below. > > > > Assuming we merge within a day or two, I propose we create

Re: Review Request: Undo redo framework for text refactored

2012-02-24 Thread C. Boemann
> On Feb. 24, 2012, 11:58 a.m., Thorsten Zachmann wrote: > > libs/kotext/KoTextEditor.cpp, lines 1891-1900 > > > > > > This code block is duplicated quite often. I think it makes sense to > > re-factor this so it

Re: Review Request: Undo redo framework for text refactored

2012-02-24 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104047/#review10863 --- The works looks quite good. Some comments. I did not test the c

Re: GSoC idea

2012-02-24 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Friday, 2012-02-24, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/23/2012 05:59 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Thursday 23 February 2012 Feb, Smit Patel wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > >>> ** > >>> On 02/23/2012 01:31 PM, Smit Patel wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi everyone, > >