2012/2/12 Martin Klapetek :
> Oops, a small clarification - we don't need Qt 4.8 for stream tubes, that's
> for dbus tubes. Sorry.
And ideally, we want to use stream tubes for such an appliance rather
than DBus tubes (unless Calligra already has an exportable DBus
interface for this purpose, which
On 02/12/2012 10:38 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> From Words' side it's a clear no unfortunately. We are not ready to entertain
this idea. Collaborative editing is very difficult and out of scope for gsoc.
The Telepathy side is the easy final touches.
You need to define the protocol, implement the pro
>From Words' side it's a clear no unfortunately. We are not ready to entertain
this idea. Collaborative editing is very difficult and out of scope for gsoc.
The Telepathy side is the easy final touches.
You need to define the protocol, implement the protocol, implement operational
transforms. P
Oops, a small clarification - we don't need Qt 4.8 for stream tubes, that's
for dbus tubes. Sorry.
--
Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 22:05, Martin Klapetek wrote:
> Just to fill in folks from Calligra on Telepathy side - we're ready :) We
> have pretty much all that is
Just to fill in folks from Calligra on Telepathy side - we're ready :) We
have pretty much all that is needed from a networking POV - we have "stream
tubes" that allows to send arbitrary data between contacts (needs Qt 4.8
though), we have embedable chat widget and contact list widget (might need
l
HI,
I would like to know if there are any plans and possibility of integrating
kde-telepathy with KWord/calligra? It would be helpful in knowing if others
are viewing the same document i.e. similar to google docs / MS lync+MSWord
integration. My understanding of the implementation and feasibility
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> **
> On 01/21/2012 10:24 PM, Panks wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Panks wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>
> On 12/26/2011 07:42 AM, Panks wrote:
>
> Sorry for late reply, College reop
On 02/12/2012 04:57 AM, C. Boemann wrote:
I've read everything all has said.
On Irc ingwa and sven made it clear that not releasing Words is not an option
(would be the firsy suite without a wordprocessor)
I personally can not accept releasing for real a wordprocessor that is TP
status. We alre
I've read everything all has said.
On Irc ingwa and sven made it clear that not releasing Words is not an option
(would be the firsy suite without a wordprocessor)
I personally can not accept releasing for real a wordprocessor that is TP
status. We already do that, and mixing it into the final
On Sunday 12 February 2012 Feb, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> I agree with all what was said if it was Boemann, Cyrille or Boudewijn. I
> would propose the following:
>
> Do one more Beta. We most likely will get the most stuff fixed but obviously
> not
> all. Release it.
Well, ok. But really t
10 matches
Mail list logo
