Re: Review Request: User defined variables (2)

2011-12-03 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103276/#review8692 --- Hello Sebastian, the new patch seems to be the same as the old

Re: broken filters in words

2011-12-03 Thread Sebastian Sauer
On 12/03/2011 04:15 PM, C. Boemann wrote: On Saturday 03 December 2011 16:10:06 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 3 December 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 12/02/2011 05:31 PM, C. Boemann wrote: On Friday 02 December 2011 09:32:56 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: In Words, the following filters are br

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-03 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Samstag 03 Dezember 2011 23:56:14 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > All minor uses of QT3SUPPORT in Kexi will be removed really soon. Only > complex code of tableview that depends on it still stays untouched > because it's tested for years with Qt 3 and Qt3 support and _is_ > stable. Well you could try

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 December 2011 23:31, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> I am ok with this at the current stage. Porting should be careful, you >> know - Kexi 1.x on Qt 3 was way more stable, and in Qt 4 version we >> have almost no extra complicated features.

Re: [calligra] /: Qt3Support is also needed in Calligra.

2011-12-03 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Friday 02 December 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > I am ok with this at the current stage. Porting should be careful, you > know - Kexi 1.x on Qt 3 was way more stable, and in Qt 4 version we > have almost no extra complicated features. How about discussing about > a deadline for removal of Qt3S

Re: broken filters in words

2011-12-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Saturday 03 December 2011 Dec, C. Boemann wrote: > I don't have that big a problem keeping them around except I really question > if they are ever going to be useful. And if so then it's just noise > How about we remove, but tag as jaroslaw suggests, and then add a READM > docment to filters

Re: broken filters in words

2011-12-03 Thread Sebastian Sauer
On 12/03/2011 04:10 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 3 December 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 12/02/2011 05:31 PM, C. Boemann wrote: On Friday 02 December 2011 09:32:56 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: In Words, the following filters are broken because they convert to/from the old kwd format whic

Re: broken filters in words

2011-12-03 Thread C. Boemann
On Saturday 03 December 2011 16:10:06 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 3 December 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > > On 12/02/2011 05:31 PM, C. Boemann wrote: > >> On Friday 02 December 2011 09:32:56 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >>> In Words, the following filters are broken because they convert to/fr

Re: broken filters in words

2011-12-03 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 3 December 2011 15:51, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 12/02/2011 05:31 PM, C. Boemann wrote: >> >> On Friday 02 December 2011 09:32:56 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >>> >>> In Words, the following filters are broken because they convert to/from >>> the >>> old kwd format which was removed. They are still

Re: broken filters in words

2011-12-03 Thread Sebastian Sauer
On 12/02/2011 05:31 PM, C. Boemann wrote: On Friday 02 December 2011 09:32:56 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: In Words, the following filters are broken because they convert to/from the old kwd format which was removed. They are still installed, though, and appear in the file dialog as options (and then

report on calligra filters generating invalid ODF

2011-12-03 Thread Jos van den Oever
Since yesterday, the script profileOfficeFileLoading.py checks the output of the calligra filters for the validity of the ODF that is generated. This test has proven it's usefullness immediately. Here are the numbers of files from the calligratests set for each file type: doc 30 653 d