Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Inge Wallin
On Monday, October 03, 2011 16:24:21 Vít Pelčák wrote: > 2011/10/3 Shantanu Tushar Jha : > > Hi, > > > > (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) > > > > There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra Active > > and how to make the user experience better.

Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Carl Symons
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Monday 03 October 2011 Oct, Vít Pelčák wrote: >> 2011/10/3 Shantanu Tushar Jha : >> > Hi, >> > >> > (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) >> > >> > There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra

Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Vít Pelčák
2011/10/3 Shantanu Tushar Jha : > >> > I'd like views from the Calligra team about this, should we continue >> > what >> > we're doing now (that is, try to improve the viewing to the most we can >> > and >> > then go to editing), or concentrate only on viewing? >> >> Sorry, but I'm missing point he

Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Shantanu Tushar Jha
Hi, On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Monday 03 October 2011 Oct, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > > Hi, > > > > (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) > > > > There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra Active > > and how to ma

Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Shantanu Tushar Jha
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Vít Pelčák wrote: > 2011/10/3 Shantanu Tushar Jha : > > Hi, > > > > (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) > > > > There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra Active > > and how to make the user experience better. > > A

Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Monday 03 October 2011 Oct, Vít Pelčák wrote: > 2011/10/3 Shantanu Tushar Jha : > > Hi, > > > > (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) > > > > There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra Active > > and how to make the user experience better. > > Aaro

Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Vít Pelčák
2011/10/3 Shantanu Tushar Jha : > Hi, > > (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) > > There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra Active > and how to make the user experience better. > Aaron Seigo had an interesting suggestion in the mail he sent [1] whi

Re: About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Monday 03 October 2011 Oct, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > Hi, > > (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) > > There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra Active > and how to make the user experience better. > Aaron Seigo had an interesting suggestion

About Calligra Active and what it should intend to be

2011-10-03 Thread Shantanu Tushar Jha
Hi, (Cross posting as the topic might be of interest to both MLs) There was recently some discussion on the Active ML about Calligra Active and how to make the user experience better. Aaron Seigo had an interesting suggestion in the mail he sent [1] which says- " but imho the most important thin

Re: compile error

2011-10-03 Thread Pierre Stirnweiss
Ok,I'll have a closer look at it then. PierreSt On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Uzak Matus wrote: > Hi, > > I don't see a reason for those linking problems (docx->libmsooxml) from the > source code point of view. There were no linking related changes for a few > months. It would be great if

RE: compile error

2011-10-03 Thread Uzak Matus
Hi, I don't see a reason for those linking problems (docx->libmsooxml) from the source code point of view. There were no linking related changes for a few months. It would be great if some Windows guy could check that. -matus -- Matus Uzak Software Designer Ixonos Slovakia s.r.o. Sturova 27,

Re: compile error

2011-10-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Saturday 01 October 2011 Oct, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > Looks like there is again a export problem in ooxml filter: > > > Linking CXX shared module ..\..\..\bin\docximport.dll >Creating library ..\..\..\bin\docximport.lib and object > ..\..\..\bin\docximport.exp > DocxXmlDocumentReader.ob