>
> I'm sorry, but I actually see no other way than what I did, but I do
> apologize
> for not having waited longer.
>
>
Although I think that the new text layout should be included in the
snapshot, I do agree with Thorsten here that the branch should have got a
better review process.
Basically say
On Thursday 28 April 2011 16:41:30 Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, April 28, 2011 13:26:22 C. Boemann wrote:
> > The text layout branch has landed in master
> >
> > Please continue work in master or your own branches from now on!
>
> I have to say that I'm a bit disappointed o
On Thursday 28 April 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> Merging such a big change only 2.5 hours there was a mail about what
> people think is not the nicest thing to do.
On a side note, if the result of the other conversation was to tag the
snapshot before the text layout, I can still tag using a
Hello,
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 13:26:22 C. Boemann wrote:
> The text layout branch has landed in master
>
> Please continue work in master or your own branches from now on!
>
I have to say that I'm a bit disappointed on how this thing went. I think for
features big as that and which affect
On Thursday 28 April 2011 Apr, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quick question for our mentors and students: have you all been in contact
> with each other already? For Krita students, we have the requirement that
> students blog at least once a week. Maybe that's a good idea for the other
> Ca
Ok Yue... I'll blog my blog's address is: http://helderc.wordpress.com/
2011/4/28 Yue Liu
> Helder, let's follow this suggestion:)
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Quick question for our mentors and students: have you all been in contact
>> with eac
Helder, let's follow this suggestion:)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quick question for our mentors and students: have you all been in contact
> with each other already? For Krita students, we have the requirement that
> students blog at least once a week. May
On 28 April 2011 15:12, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quick question for our mentors and students: have you all been in contact
> with each other already? For Krita students, we have the requirement that
> students blog at least once a week. Maybe that's a good idea for the other
> Calligra
On Thursday 28 April 2011 15:12:16 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quick question for our mentors and students: have you all been in contact
> with each other already? For Krita students, we have the requirement that
> students blog at least once a week. Maybe that's a good idea for the other
> C
Hi!
Quick question for our mentors and students: have you all been in contact with
each other already? For Krita students, we have the requirement that students
blog at least once a week. Maybe that's a good idea for the other Calligra
students as well?
--
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.
The text layout branch has landed in master
Please continue work in master or your own branches from now on!
Best regards
Casper
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Betreff: Re: The snapshot and the new text layout code.
Von: t...@exit0.net
Datum: Do, 28.04.2011, 11:58
An: i...@lysator.liu.se
"Calligra Suite developers and users mailing list"
---
> Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear
> people
> expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be merged
> before the snapshot. This worries me.
No need to worry.
I totally agree that the text layout change is a very important change.
Also I ha
I have updated the schedule to reflect this delay:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Release_Plan#2.3.71
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
I also agree. If it really is a matter of days rather than weeks. It really
would be a shame to miss one of the biggest and most noticeable change in
words. Not to mention missing the whole application, which would in my
opinion be a big problem PR wise.
Pierre
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM, E
On Thursday 28 April 2011 10:57:55 Inge Wallin wrote:
> Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear
> people expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be
> merged before the snapshot. This worries me.
>
> We do the snapshots for two reasons:
>
> 1.
Hi,
2011/4/28 Inge Wallin :
> Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear people
> expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be merged
> before the snapshot. This worries me.
>
> We do the snapshots for two reasons:
>
> 1. To get feedback on what we
Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear people
expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be merged
before the snapshot. This worries me.
We do the snapshots for two reasons:
1. To get feedback on what we have now.
2. To show some activity an
18 matches
Mail list logo
