Re: Unit test coverage

2010-12-12 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Sunday 12 December 2010, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Sunday 12 December 2010, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > > I have never really looked deep into how unit tests are set. Is there > > somewhere something I can read to give me more insight into this. For > > example, how is the coverage of a fi

Re: Unit test coverage

2010-12-12 Thread Dag Andersen
Søndag 12 december 2010 10:21:46 skrev Cyrille Berger Skott: > Hi, > > I have setup a nightly build for calligra, which is intented if you have > heavy unit tests that cannot be run for every commit. And also for unit > test coverage. > > The results is that we currently have a 26% coverage. It i

Re: [Kexi] Meego 1.1 and Koffice 2.2.95 - No Kexi package

2010-12-12 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Sunday, December 12, 2010 01:40:13 am you wrote: > On 12 December 2010 10:01, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > Well kexi is disabled in TINY. > > That's true but in the url above I see not just freoffice but regular > koffice apps wihout TINY. > If I am not mistaken we would expect regular kexi

Re: Unit test coverage

2010-12-12 Thread Pierre Stirnweiss
I have never really looked deep into how unit tests are set. Is there somewhere something I can read to give me more insight into this. For example, how is the coverage of a file calculated? Pierre On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Sunday 12 December 2010, Cyril

Re: [Kexi] Meego 1.1 and Koffice 2.2.95 - No Kexi package

2010-12-12 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 12 December 2010 10:01, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Sunday 12 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 12 December 2010 02:04, Noli Sicad wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I found that koffice and freoffice rpm in this repository state for >> > meego_1.1_core (below). >> > >> > https://build.

Re: Unit test coverage

2010-12-12 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Sunday, December 12, 2010 01:21:46 am Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > I have setup a nightly build for calligra, which is intented if you have > heavy unit tests that cannot be run for every commit. And also for unit > test coverage. > > The results is that we currently have a 26% covera

Re: [Kexi] Meego 1.1 and Koffice 2.2.95 - No Kexi package

2010-12-12 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Sunday, December 12, 2010 01:01:42 am Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Sunday 12 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > On 12 December 2010 02:04, Noli Sicad wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I found that koffice and freoffice rpm in this repository state for > > > meego_1.1_core (below). > > >

Re: [Kexi] Meego 1.1 and Koffice 2.2.95 - No Kexi package

2010-12-12 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 12 December 2010 02:04, Noli Sicad wrote: > Hi, > > I found that koffice and freoffice rpm in this repository state for > meego_1.1_core (below). > > https://build.pub.meego.com/package/binaries?package=koffice&project=home%3Amkruisselbrink%3Aminimalkde&repository=meego_1.1_core > > However, th