Re: Integration | Allow merging of MR when Pipeline must succeed is enabled in absence of pipeline (#18)

2025-02-19 Thread Amar Takhar (@amar)
Amar Takhar commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/integration/-/issues/18#note_120089 Removing due date this issue at GitLab has slipped again and no longer has anyone working on it or any milestone set. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/integratio

Re: Documentation | Draft: Convert files from reST to MarkDown (!155)

2025-02-19 Thread Amar Takhar (@amar)
Amar Takhar pushed new commits to merge request !155 Merge request URL: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/merge_requests/155 * 4f836c0c - conf: Fix typo * c838d758 - conf: Set some navigation defaults * 205fa862 - posix-compliance: Convert to MarkDown -- View it on GitLab: ht

Re: Documentation | POSIX Compliance Navigation Tree is Wrong (#86)

2025-02-19 Thread Amar Takhar (@amar)
Amar Takhar commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/issues/86#note_120092 I've converted the script to MarkDown but the lack of anything showing up in the left navigation bar is a bug in the theme or maybe it's not. The solution would be to split each section into its o

Re: Integration | Allow merging of MR when Pipeline must succeed is enabled in absence of pipeline (#18)

2025-02-19 Thread Amar Takhar (@amar)
The following issue is due on 2025-02-21: Issue 18: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/integration/-/issues/18";>#18 Author:Amar Takhar Assignees: This is set to be added to GitLab 17.9 not sure if it will happen. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/334281 -- View it on G

Documentation | POSIX Compliance Navigation Tree is Wrong (#86)

2025-02-19 Thread Joel Sherrill (@joel)
Joel Sherrill created an issue: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/issues/86 Assignee: Amar Takhar ## Summary Visit [Compliance Guide](https://docs.rtems.org/docs/main/posix-compliance/) and look at the left hand side index. It is missing chapters 4-34. Chapters 3-34 are automa

Re: Documentation | waf: Fix singlehtml output (!104)

2025-02-19 Thread ita2048 ita2048 (@ita2048)
ita2048 ita2048 commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/merge_requests/104#note_120086 Thank you for confirming the behavior above. The inliner application will always attempt to read from its input channel, and then outputs nothing if no bytes are read.

Re: Documentation | waf: Fix singlehtml output (!104)

2025-02-19 Thread Frank Kuehndel (@frank_k)
Frank Kuehndel commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/docs/rtems-docs/-/merge_requests/104#note_120085 `user.html.err` contains a few empty lines (the first output example above shows `stderr` after the ``). I have also seen the beginning of the normal output (like `3