I have some old versions of BWK awk that can be used for testing.
(I think as far back as ~ 1993; I'd have to check.)
I don't think it's important to go that far back.
My main concern would be working with some awk that standardly comes
with Solaris and BSD systems.
To that end, can I
Hi.
> As a hypothetical question, if I rewrote texindex in awk and it
> functioned as a drop-in replacement, would you take it?
>
> I don't see why not. It would surely be easier to maintain.
>
> If you go that route, one thing I would really like to do is change the
> .?? index files to
As a hypothetical question, if I rewrote texindex in awk and it
functioned as a drop-in replacement, would you take it?
I don't see why not. It would surely be easier to maintain.
If you go that route, one thing I would really like to do is change the
.?? index files to use @ as the esca
Hi Karl.
k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) wrote:
> Finally getting back to:
>
> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:56:13 +0200
> ...
> @cindex @r{@{foo@}} program
> Which should be indexed under { ends up being indexed under |
>
> Same is true for just @cindex @{, BTW.
>
> The
Finally getting back to:
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:56:13 +0200
...
@cindex @r{@{foo@}} program
Which should be indexed under { ends up being indexed under |
Same is true for just @cindex @{, BTW.
The problem, I believe, is with texindex, which is not prepared to
handle
Hi. Something like
@cindex @r{@{foo@}} program
Which should be indexed under { ends up being indexed under |
This is with the latest SVN version of texinfo.tex, and also earlier ones.
Thanks,
Arnold
