On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:35:29PM -0800, David Bacon wrote:
> I am already working with a patched texinfo.tex, so I would be happy to be
> a guinea pig (and likely early adopter) for your proposed table-of-contents
> feature if you want one.
Could you try texinfo.tex version 2022-12-03.17? (git
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:44:05PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:16:44AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> >
> > In term of implementation, it could indeed be solved in the converters.
>
> Should be done in
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/texinfo.git/commit/?id=89594d63
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:16:44AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
> In term of implementation, it could indeed be solved in the converters.
Should be done in
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/texinfo.git/commit/?id=89594d63e7f5fa0796be4c0002d6200219ef5e62
@Gavin, I think that it should go to the
I think I pretty much agree with you and Gavin all around on this. Nodes
and section titles make good endpoints, not good things to have further
links springing from.
Meanwhile, thank you VERY much for that nugget about
xrefautomaticsectiontitle!
dB
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 3:16 PM Patrice Du
Yes, those refs in @section lines are admittedly a bit of a hack, though
it would be nice from the pure orthogonality point of view if they didn't
have to be ruled out. But it sounds like supporting them robustly might be
quite a hairy mess to implement, of questionable value, and perhaps not
wort
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:42:20PM -0800, David Bacon wrote:
> But I like such constructs! I have one in every one of the 249 @section
> commands in the document I originally submitted with the bug report. They
> are there so that the Table of Contents in the PDF has a nice link from the
> name o
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:42:20PM -0800, David Bacon wrote:
> But I like such constructs! I have one in every one of the 249 @section
> commands in the document I originally submitted with the bug report. They
> are there so that the Table of Contents in the PDF has a nice link from the
> name o
But I like such constructs! I have one in every one of the 249 @section
commands in the document I originally submitted with the bug report. They
are there so that the Table of Contents in the PDF has a nice link from the
name of the operator or function to the right place in the document (not
ju
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 09:12:56PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:07:05AM -0800, David Bacon wrote:
> > Wow, well done, reducing it to such a nice tidy little test case!
>
> Actually the smallest case is the following (which I thought we tested
> for...):
>
> @node sharp
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:07:05AM -0800, David Bacon wrote:
> Wow, well done, reducing it to such a nice tidy little test case!
Actually the smallest case is the following (which I thought we tested
for...):
@node sharp
@section @ref{sharp} tuple
> I'm sure you've also realized by now that I li
Wow, well done, reducing it to such a nice tidy little test case!
I'm sure you've also realized by now that I lied about Ubuntu (Ubuntu 22.10
currently comes with only version 6.8; I was actually running the 7.0
version that I got directly from the GNU) -- but in fact the same bug
afflicts 6.8 as
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:30:08AM -0800, David Bacon wrote:
> The following command on the attached .texi file never terminates, but
> spins while consuming more and more memory until it is killed:
>
> $ makeinfo --html --no-split --no-headers setl-lib.texi
Thanks for the report.
I'll have a lo
12 matches
Mail list logo
