On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 02:41:46PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 03:29:22PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > I think that for @t, it would be better to use
> > and have span.t => font-family: monospace; as I propose
> > above, as @t has no semantic interpretation of code. (Fo
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 03:29:22PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> I think that for @t, it would be better to use
> and have span.t => font-family: monospace; as I propose
> above, as @t has no semantic interpretation of code. (For all the other
> places where we used before, is most likely bette
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 06:33:33PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > acronym HTML element replaced by abbr, and tt by a span, where there is
> > no semantics for the tt, for example with @t. This would lead to
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > span.t => font-family: monospace;
> >
> > Does it looks ok?
>
> @t
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 06:33:33PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I propose to replace the elements removed from HTML5, acronym and tt.
> > acronym HTML element replaced by abbr, and tt by a span, where there is
> > no
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I propose to replace the elements removed from HTML5, acronym and tt.
> acronym HTML element replaced by abbr, and tt by a span, where there is
> no semantics for the tt, for example with @t. This would lead to
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2022, at 15:29, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I propose to replace the elements removed from HTML5, acronym and tt.
> acronym HTML element replaced by abbr, and tt by a span, where there is
> no semantics for the tt, for example with @t. This would lead to
>
>
>
>
> spa
Hello,
I propose to replace the elements removed from HTML5, acronym and tt.
acronym HTML element replaced by abbr, and tt by a span, where there is
no semantics for the tt, for example with @t. This would lead to
span.t => font-family: monospace;
Does it looks ok?
--
Pat
