Re: just for fun

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 04:30:49AM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Also this: https://practicaltypography.com/bold-or-italic.html > > IMHO, these advices are not applicable for technical documentation, > since different kinds of meta-ness *do* make sense. I agree. Robin culd punch back, sayi

Re: just for fun

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 04:30:49AM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Also this: https://practicaltypography.com/bold-or-italic.html > > IMHO, these advices are not applicable for technical documentation, > since different kinds of meta-ness *do* make sense. > Fair enough.

Re: just for fun

> Also this: https://practicaltypography.com/bold-or-italic.html IMHO, these advices are not applicable for technical documentation, since different kinds of meta-ness *do* make sense. Werner

just for fun

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 1:53 PM Gavin Smith wrote: > Side issue but slanted bold typewriter is likely not available as a font > and font commands in Texinfo don't (usually?) nest, so @strong would switch > to a bold Roman font regardless of the current style. Just for fun https:/