Re: texinfo.tex indexing bug

2014-02-16 Thread Karl Berry
I have some old versions of BWK awk that can be used for testing. (I think as far back as ~ 1993; I'd have to check.) I don't think it's important to go that far back. My main concern would be working with some awk that standardly comes with Solaris and BSD systems. To that end, can I

Re: texinfo.tex indexing bug

2014-02-15 Thread Aharon Robbins
Hi. > As a hypothetical question, if I rewrote texindex in awk and it > functioned as a drop-in replacement, would you take it? > > I don't see why not. It would surely be easier to maintain. > > If you go that route, one thing I would really like to do is change the > .?? index files to

Re: texinfo.tex indexing bug

2014-02-12 Thread Karl Berry
As a hypothetical question, if I rewrote texindex in awk and it functioned as a drop-in replacement, would you take it? I don't see why not. It would surely be easier to maintain. If you go that route, one thing I would really like to do is change the .?? index files to use @ as the esca

Re: texinfo.tex indexing bug

2014-02-12 Thread arnold
Hi Karl. k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) wrote: > Finally getting back to: > > Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:56:13 +0200 > ... > @cindex @r{@{foo@}} program > Which should be indexed under { ends up being indexed under | > > Same is true for just @cindex @{, BTW. > > The

Re: texinfo.tex indexing bug

2014-02-10 Thread Karl Berry
Finally getting back to: Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:56:13 +0200 ... @cindex @r{@{foo@}} program Which should be indexed under { ends up being indexed under | Same is true for just @cindex @{, BTW. The problem, I believe, is with texindex, which is not prepared to handle

texinfo.tex indexing bug

2013-12-03 Thread Aharon Robbins
Hi. Something like @cindex @r{@{foo@}} program Which should be indexed under { ends up being indexed under | This is with the latest SVN version of texinfo.tex, and also earlier ones. Thanks, Arnold

Re: indexing bug

2000-09-07 Thread Karl Berry
AR> Subsequent index pages only use 1/3 the page! I've updated ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/texinfo.tex with a version that (I believe) fixes this ...

Re: indexing bug

2000-08-29 Thread Karl Berry
Anyways, would adding "@setchapternewpage on" just before "@node index" solve the problem? Probably, but it shouldn't be necessary. I'll take a look when I can. Meanwhile, please do feel free to work around the bug.

indexing bug

2000-08-29 Thread Richard Kim
> "AR" == Aharon Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AR> Get the current standards.texi, format it with AR> version 1999-04-25.15 and look at the index. AR> It seems that `@setchapternewpage off' is in effect. AR> The index starts in the middle of page 59, and is AR> abou

indexing bug

2000-08-29 Thread Aharon Robbins
Get the current standards.texi, format it with version 1999-04-25.15 and look at the index. It seems that `@setchapternewpage off' is in effect. The index starts in the middle of page 59, and is about 1/3 of the page in size. Subsequent index pages only use 1/3 the page! See pages 59-64. Arno