Re: failures with parallel tests

2014-05-19 Thread Gavin Smith
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > Is there some crazy way to avoid pty's completely? I suspect they are > inherently random trouble. I mean, tests presumably can't use a "real" > terminal, pseudo or otherwise, it all has to be batch anyway. > (Sorry for not actually looking a

Re: failures with parallel tests

2014-05-19 Thread Karl Berry
Is there some crazy way to avoid pty's completely? I suspect they are inherently random trouble. I mean, tests presumably can't use a "real" terminal, pseudo or otherwise, it all has to be batch anyway. (Sorry for not actually looking at what you are doing with the ptys, likely I'm totally offbas

Re: failures with parallel tests

2014-05-19 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote: >> Hello, >> >> With info tests, when doing parallel tests, with >> make -j8 check >> for example, there may be some failures that do not happen for >> sequantial tests. It is not that mu

Re: failures with parallel tests

2014-05-18 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > With info tests, when doing parallel tests, with > make -j8 check > for example, there may be some failures that do not happen for > sequantial tests. It is not that much reproducible. There is something > in the log that could

failures with parallel tests

2014-05-18 Thread Patrice Dumas
Hello, With info tests, when doing parallel tests, with make -j8 check for example, there may be some failures that do not happen for sequantial tests. It is not that much reproducible. There is something in the log that could point to the issue though: FAIL: t/body-start.sh ==