On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 08:49:20PM +, Frederico Muñoz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Patrice Dumas writes:
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 09:52:52PM +, Frederico Muñoz wrote:
>
> Yes, and initially I couldn't reproduce it: its the --no-number-sections
> that makes it like that.
Actually it does not s
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 04:20:46PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > I tried it, and almost! Maybe there's an option somewhere that I'm not
> > setting correctly, but since using @nodedescription only works with
> > FORMAT_MENU="menu", it seems that it always uses the node name in the
> > menu (even
Hello,
Patrice Dumas writes:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 09:52:52PM +, Frederico Muñoz wrote:
>> Patrice Dumas writes:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> One thing I've noticed is that with USE_NODE=0 and FORMAT_MENU="menu",
>> the MENU_SYMBOL isn't used. It works as expected with either
>> USE_NODE=1 or FORM
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 09:52:52PM +, Frederico Muñoz wrote:
> Patrice Dumas writes:
>
> Hello,
>
> One thing I've noticed is that with USE_NODE=0 and FORMAT_MENU="menu",
> the MENU_SYMBOL isn't used. It works as expected with either
> USE_NODE=1 or FORMAT_MENU="sectiontoc" though.
With FOR
Patrice Dumas writes:
Hello,
Thank you again for your help.
(...)
> It is possible that there should also be USE_NODES set to 0, according
> to my reading of the code. But I do not know why it is the case, it
> does not follow the documentation. I may try to use the section
> whenever possibl
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 12:16:10PM +, Frederico Muñoz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apologies for the not getting back sooner - delayed, but not forgotten!
> - and thank you for your help, including code diffs which were very
> useful.
>
> Patrice Dumas writes:
> > Maybe this is what you are looking f
Hello,
Apologies for the not getting back sooner - delayed, but not forgotten!
- and thank you for your help, including code diffs which were very
useful.
Patrice Dumas writes:
>> ** Automatic creation of "extended" menus.
(...)
> The idea of the sectiontoc is to output sectioning commands, like
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 06:40:10PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> It is easy enough, I expect, to achieve such links by post-processing
> the HTML output, but adding built-in support in texi2any to add external
> navigation links might be worth considering, in order to make it more
> convenient.
Not
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:38:09PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> We have added a new command @nodedescription in the upcoming release
> that contains the description that appears in @menus allowing to have an
> automatic generation of menus with descriptions. For example:
>
> @node Copying Condit
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 10:38:09PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > == Adding a "Top" navigation entry
> >
> > For a web page I find it useful to be able to easily go to the
> > homepage. I'm manually changing the HTML to add a "Top" navigation entry
> > that points to the index page. I experimente
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:03:36AM +0100, Frederico Muñoz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Texinfo for my personal blog, using texi2any to do the heavy
> lifting (check https://interlaye.red/Texiblog.html for the idea behind
> it and a link to the repository).
Interesting!
> ** Automatic creation o
Hi,
I'm using Texinfo for my personal blog, using texi2any to do the heavy
lifting (check https://interlaye.red/Texiblog.html for the idea behind
it and a link to the repository).
I've noticed some changes and improvements in texi2any since 7.0.3,
which "forced" me to fix some things on my side
12 matches
Mail list logo
