On 10/6/2014 3:48 PM, Gavin Smith wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I just took over as the Cygwin maintainer of Texinfo, and I bumped into a
few (easily fixed) build problems. The first two exist in texinfo-5.2, and
the rest only in the trunk.
I think that it is them a
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> I just took over as the Cygwin maintainer of Texinfo, and I bumped into a
> few (easily fixed) build problems. The first two exist in texinfo-5.2, and
> the rest only in the trunk.
I think that it is them all done now. Please email if any proble
> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:49:44 +0100
> From: Gavin Smith
> Cc: Ken Brown , Texinfo
>
> I am wondering if "sys/ioctl.h" should be added to AC_CHECK_HEADERS in
> configure.ac and then the include made conditional on
> "HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H".
Probably a good idea.
>> >> --- info/termdep.h (revision 5852)
>> >> +++ info/termdep.h (working copy)
>> >> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
>> >> # endif /* !HAVE_TERMIO_H */
>> >> #endif /* !HAVE_TERMIOS_H */
>> >>
>> >> -#ifdef GWINSZ_IN_SYS_IOCTL
>> >> +#ifndef __MINGW32__
>> >> # include
>> >> #endif
>> >>
>
On 10/3/2014 2:31 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
What about file names with drive letters? Experience (in the GNU Make
department) indicates that some Cygwin users want that, perhaps
because they use Cygwin tools outside of the Cygwin environment.
OK, maybe I shouldn't rock the boat. I'll withdraw
> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:55:29 -0400
> From: Ken Brown
> Cc: Texinfo
>
> On 10/2/2014 6:24 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> > I think it's all OK, but I have to think a little more about comparison of
> > file
> > names. I'll get back to you on that.
>
> I'm not sure about comparison of file names,
> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:24:49 -0400
> From: Ken Brown
> Cc: Texinfo
>
> >> -#ifdef GWINSZ_IN_SYS_IOCTL
> >> +#ifndef __MINGW32__
> >> # include
> >> #endif
> >>
> >
> > I see the same thing (conditional on __MINGW32__) is done when
> > including sys/ioctl.h in info/ioctl.h and info/man
> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:24:49 -0400
> From: Ken Brown
> Cc: Texinfo
>
> > If I understand this right, O_BINARY is being checked to see if it is
> > a Posix-style system, right, but Cygwin has O_BINARY defined? O_BINARY
> > is not actually being set in system.h for the benefit of source code
On 10/2/2014 6:24 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I think it's all OK, but I have to think a little more about comparison of file
names. I'll get back to you on that.
I'm not sure about comparison of file names, so maybe it would be safer to use
case-insensitive comparison as before. This requires addi
On 10/2/2014 4:37 PM, Gavin Smith wrote:
1. The compiler produces lots of warnings about setmode being redefined. It
would be simple to silence the warnings, but the real issue in my opinion is
that Cygwin should be treated the same as Unix, so that there's no need for
setmode at all:
Index: sy
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> I just took over as the Cygwin maintainer of Texinfo, and I bumped into a
> few (easily fixed) build problems. The first two exist in texinfo-5.2, and
> the rest only in the trunk.
Thanks for the report. Comments below:
> 1. The compiler produc
I just took over as the Cygwin maintainer of Texinfo, and I bumped into a few
(easily fixed) build problems. The first two exist in texinfo-5.2, and the rest
only in the trunk.
1. The compiler produces lots of warnings about setmode being redefined. It
would be simple to silence the warnings
12 matches
Mail list logo
