TeX4ht could be an alternative for what I'd like to achieve.
Speaking as one of the (sort of) maintainers of tex4ht ... sure, give it
a try, I'll be curious what you think, but I doubt it'd be easy to make
use of it. tex4ht has lots of complications of its own. It can, in
general, output ma
Hi Gavin and Karl,
On 31.05.2016 23:56, Karl Berry wrote:
> Hi Oliver and Gavin and all,
>
> support for a program called tex2ht, but I've never used it.
>
> tex4ht
TeX4ht could be an alternative for what I'd like to achieve. I'll try
and see what it can do for me.
> > - I have to find
Hi Oliver and Gavin and all,
support for a program called tex2ht, but I've never used it.
tex4ht
> - I have to find a way to bundle / integrate / use the other perl module
> LaTeXML into Texinfo.
LaTeXML (http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML) is a fantastic program, but it is
huge -- 7MB, a
On 30 May 2016 at 23:01, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to do something about the missing support of the @math
> macro in HTML output. It has always bugged me that this macro does
> nothing for non-PDF output, since the TeX-syntax math is pretty useless
> for many readers of the
Hello,
I would like to do something about the missing support of the @math
macro in HTML output. It has always bugged me that this macro does
nothing for non-PDF output, since the TeX-syntax math is pretty useless
for many readers of the final document. So, it would be better to have
@math support
