On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 04:14:24PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:31:35PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > > Could add the number of footnotes * 2 and the number of special units
> > > > (including special units not associated to a section/node). And
> > > > sections numbe
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:31:35PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > Could add the number of footnotes * 2 and the number of special units
> > > (including special units not associated to a section/node). And
> > > sections number should be * 3 for contents and shortcontents targets.
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:24:26PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:50:01AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:16:58PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > > This looks good to me, it is qu
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:24:26PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:50:01AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:16:58PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > > This looks good to me, it is qu
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:50:01AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:16:58PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > This looks good to me, it is quite simple. Maybe the number of buckets
> > > could be set based on
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:31:07PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:16:58PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > This looks good to me, it is quite simple. Maybe the number of buckets
> > could be set based on the number of sections + nodes + index entries?
>
> Great idea, I was
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:16:58PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> This looks good to me, it is quite simple. Maybe the number of buckets
> could be set based on the number of sections + nodes + index entries?
Great idea, I was concerned that I'd hardcoded the number of buckets.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:21:50PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> I may as well post what I've been able to come up with. The new
> code is about 150 lines of C, in the file convert/hashmap.c (patch
> below). Probably not perfect but hopefully simple enough to be
> maintainable.
>
> If this approac
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 01:25:31PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> These numbers do not seem so high that we need an ultra-optimised
> algorithm (developed by C++ boffins) to deal with them - anything faster
> than a linear search would probably good enough.
>
> I have some spare time over the next co
On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 02:28:02PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 12:09:45PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 09:53:22AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > > How much slower would the linear search actually be?
> > >
> > > It is much slower (if I recall w
10 matches
Mail list logo
