On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:06:38PM -0700, Collin Funk wrote:
> Is there any benefit to doing this over just doing:
>
> $ git am 0001-example-commit.patch
>
> That command should set the author correctly.
>
> Collin
It's because we keep a ChangeLog file changes to which need to
be included i
Hi Gavin and Patrice,
Gavin Smith writes:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:06:17AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The analysis and patch look good to me. Gavin, I think that you can
>> apply it (I know that it is a kind of patch practical for git to get
>> both the patch and commiter r
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:06:17AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The analysis and patch look good to me. Gavin, I think that you can
> apply it (I know that it is a kind of patch practical for git to get
> both the patch and commiter right, but I don't know how to apply that
> kind of
t; satisfied the uninitialized pointer is passed to strcmp.
>
> I have attached a proposed patch.
>
> Collin
>
> From a757289836db44501eb667ee222fa48fd5da31a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-ID:
>
> From: Collin Funk
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 18:32:19 -0700
}
This warning seems accurate to me, since if the first condition is not
satisfied the uninitialized pointer is passed to strcmp.
I have attached a proposed patch.
Collin
>From a757289836db44501eb667ee222fa48fd5da31a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-ID:
From: Colli
