On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 07:48:14PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> >
> > I've committed the change.
> >
> > One command that removes all untracked header files is:
> >
> > git status -u | grep '\.h$' | xargs rm
>
> This is somewhat da
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> I've committed the change.
>
> One command that removes all untracked header files is:
>
> git status -u | grep '\.h$' | xargs rm
This is somewhat dangerous, though, as it removes .h in out of source
build directories, and if ther
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 10:11:24PM +0200, Alexandre Ferrieux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/10/2024 21:55, Gavin Smith wrote:
> >
> > Yes the locale.h file (generated from locale.in.h) should not exist
> > on release/7.1. locale.in.h is tracked in git but locale.h is not so
> > is not removed by "git swi
Hi,
On 08/10/2024 21:55, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> Yes the locale.h file (generated from locale.in.h) should not exist
> on release/7.1. locale.in.h is tracked in git but locale.h is not so
> is not removed by "git switch". I'll have to find some way of deleting
> this file and others when I switch
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:55:30PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:23:37PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:13:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > It could only be because I switched from the master branch and there
> > > is something left over from
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:23:37PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:13:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > It could only be because I switched from the master branch and there
> > is something left over from building from the master branch.
>
> ALl the more likely that the g
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 08:13:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> It could only be because I switched from the master branch and there
> is something left over from building from the master branch.
ALl the more likely that the gnulib versions of 7.1 and master are
probably substantially different now
On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 11:22:06AM -0600, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Apologies for the delay in replying, I've been offline for several
> > days.
> >
> > Thank you for the report. I have fixed all the cases in the manu
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> The code that moves index entries after @item was actually confused by
> @subentry. Should be fixed in:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/texinfo.git/commit/?id=5e8fccc9bd1fb775654ebb2e2334682a83cc47c0
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> @Gavin maybe to be considered for 7.1.
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 11:22:06AM -0600, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Apologies for the delay in replying, I've been offline for several
> days.
>
> Thank you for the report. I have fixed all the cases in the manual
> and will push it to Git shortly. The HTML manual will be updated
> when
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 06:45:27PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 11:22:06AM -0600, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> > IMHO this is really a makeinfo bug (and indeed, the Info file doesn't
> > change after this update), so I'm cc-ing the texinfo folks.
>
> I am not sure what the bug
You're welcome.
Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> Hello Arnold, Gavin, all,
>
> Le 05/10/2024 à 20:18, arn...@skeeve.com a écrit :
> > Looking more closely at the gawk.html file for gawk5 5.3.1, from
> > September 22, I don't see these blank lines. It may be that
> > you have an old version?
> >
> >
Hello Arnold, Gavin, all,
Le 05/10/2024 à 20:18, arn...@skeeve.com a écrit :
Looking more closely at the gawk.html file for gawk5 5.3.1, from
September 22, I don't see these blank lines. It may be that
you have an old version?
In any case, I have fixed the doc and pushed it to git.
Arnold
arn
Looking more closely at the gawk.html file for gawk5 5.3.1, from
September 22, I don't see these blank lines. It may be that
you have an old version?
In any case, I have fixed the doc and pushed it to git.
Arnold
arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Apologies for the delay in replying, I've been
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 11:22:06AM -0600, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> IMHO this is really a makeinfo bug (and indeed, the Info file doesn't
> change after this update), so I'm cc-ing the texinfo folks.
I am not sure what the bug is supposed to be here. The bug report
said "ul" and "ol" which I ass
Hi.
Apologies for the delay in replying, I've been offline for several
days.
Thank you for the report. I have fixed all the cases in the manual
and will push it to Git shortly. The HTML manual will be updated
when I next make a release.
IMHO this is really a makeinfo bug (and indeed, the Info f
16 matches
Mail list logo
