Re: @lisp vs @example lisp in HTMLL

2025-06-18 Thread Raymond Toy
On 6/15/25 11:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 16:16:23 -0700 From: Raymond Toy I also noticed that @example c is accepted. Should it be? Yes. From the Texinfo manual: You may optionally give arguments to the ‘@example’ command, separated by commas if there is more

Re: @lisp vs @example lisp in HTMLL

2025-06-17 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Gavin Smith > Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 21:25:39 +0100 > Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 04:16:23PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > > In > > https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040lisp.html, > > it says |@lisp| is the same as |@examle lisp|. In the

Re: @lisp vs @example lisp in HTMLL

2025-06-16 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 04:16:23PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote: > In > https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040lisp.html, > it says |@lisp| is the same as |@examle lisp|. In the generated HTML file, > visually, they produce the same thing. However, the html code is quite > d

Re: @lisp vs @example lisp in HTMLL

2025-06-15 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 16:16:23 -0700 > From: Raymond Toy > > I also noticed that @example c is accepted. Should it be? Yes. From the Texinfo manual: You may optionally give arguments to the ‘@example’ command, separated by commas if there is more than one. In the HTML output, any

@lisp vs @example lisp in HTMLL

2025-06-15 Thread Raymond Toy
In https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040lisp.html, it says |@lisp| is the same as |@examle lisp|. In the generated HTML file, visually, they produce the same thing. However, the html code is quite different. So for this test: |@lisp (member :internal :external :