Hi Gavin and Patrice,
Gavin Smith writes:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:06:17AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The analysis and patch look good to me. Gavin, I think that you can
>> apply it (I know that it is a kind of patch practical for git to get
>> both the patch and commiter r
}
This warning seems accurate to me, since if the first condition is not
satisfied the uninitialized pointer is passed to strcmp.
I have attached a proposed patch.
Collin
>From a757289836db44501eb667ee222fa48fd5da31a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-ID:
From: Colli
Hi Patrice,
Patrice Dumas writes:
> I realized that there was a bug because I had set SEARCH_BINDING start
> and end offsets to size_t, which lead s.start becoming the max size_t
> value (and to a segfault), I had not seen it while reviewing the code
> for such possibilities.
>
> Keeping long co
