>> Thanks, this helps: for my version of the LilyPond Notation
>> Reference a value of 10pt works just fine. Before that I tried
>> 20pt, however, I got a different but equally bad gap as reported
>> originally. This makes me wonder whether we are we really turning
>> the right screw...
>
> I tr
>> While playing around with adding parts to LilyPond's Notation
>> Reference, I got the attached layout in the ToC. As can be seen,
>> there is a vertical gap corresponding to approx. 8 lines(!) at the
>> bottom of page vi; I've never noticed such a large gap before in any
>> Texinfo document. [
>> I played around a bit more, and I think it looks good if the
>> vertical space right before the part entry gets increased a bit,
>> see attached image.
>
> I think it will be safest to keep the same size for the text,
> and just to use increased spacing before the part line to separate
> it v
On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 11:55:11PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 07:54:36PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > > I checked that a tag that is not 'Node:' or 'Ref:' has the Info reader
> > > (but not the Emacs Info reader) stop going through tags immediatly.
> > > This means that
On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 06:10:52AM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> [texinfo.tex 2025-03-22.08]
> [luatex Version 1.22.0 (TeX Live 2025), Development id: 7673]
>
>
> While playing around with adding parts to LilyPond's Notation
> Reference, I got the attached layout in the ToC. As can be seen,
> Since `@part` is outside of the sectioning hierarchy I suggest to
> not indent it at all, see the second attached image; doing so has
> the additional bonus that it sticks out more prominently – right
> now, because it uses the same font and size as ToC entries for
> `@chapter`, it can be easily
