I just sent an email to CTAN asking for some info on this package. Waiting for
its reply.
于 2025年6月24日 GMT+08:00 23:40:15，Gavin Smith 写道：
>On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:58:50PM +0800, Rivulet Cedar wrote:
>> Hello everyone! We are having problems localising the Guix manual:
>>
>> https://codeberg.
Hello everyone! We are having problems localising the Guix manual:
https://codeberg.org/guix/translations/issues/1#issuecomment-5537951
The CTAN package is still at version 6.8, missing files like texinfo-zh.tex.
Rivulet Cedar
For many years (dating back to when I maintained Texinfo), the way
Texinfo gets to CTAN is that I download the distribution tarball(s),
unpack it in ftp://tug.org/tex/texinfo*, and CTAN mirrors from there.
The CTAN metadata does not get updated in that process. It would not be
simple to do that. At
The CTAN package is still at version 6.8, missing files like
texinfo-zh.tex.
Apart from anything else, texinfo-zh.tex is present on CTAN.
https://ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/texinfo/texinfo/doc/texinfo-zh.tex
Maybe you ended up at a stale mirror. Don't know.
Anyway, I see that I need to
Hi Gavin,
uploads to CTAN are normally done by the maintainers of the package
itself.
I don't know who uploaded it back then in 2021.
I would suggest either requesting removal or uploading the latest
version https://ctan.org/upload which takes only a very short time.
Best regards
Norbert
--
D
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:58:50PM +0800, Rivulet Cedar wrote:
> Hello everyone! We are having problems localising the Guix manual:
>
> https://codeberg.org/guix/translations/issues/1#issuecomment-5537951
>
> The CTAN package is still at version 6.8, missing files like texinfo-zh.tex.
I had a lo
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:58:50PM +0800, Rivulet Cedar wrote:
> Hello everyone! We are having problems localising the Guix manual:
>
> https://codeberg.org/guix/translations/issues/1#issuecomment-5537951
>
> The CTAN package is still at version 6.8, missing files like texinfo-zh.tex.
> Rivulet C
> From: Gavin Smith
> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 21:46:08 +0100
> Cc: pertu...@free.fr, bug-texinfo@gnu.org
>
> > I'm not sure I understand what is the bad structure. If you allude to
> > the lack of link back to Getopt's node, then that's expected with such
> > a structure. Users could perhaps cli
