Re: important change in perlt/t/*.t test suite incoming

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 10:46:26PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > The format of the test in tta/perl/t/*.t is going to change, replacing > Perl tree structure with a textual representation of the tree, which > should contain the same information. The corresponding commit will be a > big

important change in perlt/t/*.t test suite incoming

2025-03-02 Thread Patrice Dumas
Hello, The format of the test in tta/perl/t/*.t is going to change, replacing Perl tree structure with a textual representation of the tree, which should contain the same information. The corresponding commit will be a big commit, and we cannot really know if there is gonna be some errors in the

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread pertusus
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:33:45PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 04:58:09PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > > > > (However, I'm not certain that .translit etc. suffixes would be the > > > end of augmenting the htmlxref.cnf format, so we should think if there > > > are any ot

Re: use heading like sectioning commands with USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:22:10PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > The @xref produces "See Section0.1 [Node 1]". > > > > But the link in the PDF actually goes to the @section in the PDF (after > > the aaa), not the @node. > > > > If the @section line is not there at all, it is not possible to ref

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 04:58:09PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > > (However, I'm not certain that .translit etc. suffixes would be the > > end of augmenting the htmlxref.cnf format, so we should think if there > > are any other factors that would affect HTML cross-references.) > > Maybe we cou

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread pertusus
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 02:19:26PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:59:27PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 11:43:37AM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:27:49PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > > > Could we look at extending

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread pertusus
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 02:19:26PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > hello typetranslit > hello mono${GS}/hello/manual/hello.html > hello node${GS}/hello/manual/html_node_node/ > hello node.translit ${GS}/hello/manual/html_node_translit/ > > then I g

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:59:27PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 11:43:37AM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:27:49PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > > Could we look at extending the htmlxref.cnf format? > > > > As well as mono/chapter/section/nod

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread pertusus
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 11:43:37AM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:27:49PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > Could we look at extending the htmlxref.cnf format? > > As well as mono/chapter/section/node, like: > > GS = ${G}/software > hello mono${GS}/hello/manua

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:27:49PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > There is another change that I would like to do. To have > TRANSLITERATE_FILE_NAMES remain relevant and does not prevent > corss-references to/from external manuals from working, I propose to add > another variable to control the

Re: use heading like sectioning commands with USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE

2025-03-02 Thread pertusus
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:02:25PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:48:26AM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 01:17:43PM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > > > > I propose that, if USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE is set, the > > > > @*heading appeari

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread pertusus
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:06:27AM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:57:40AM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 08:09:57PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > > ADD_TRANSLITERATED_REDIRECTION_FILES would be fine. I guess it could be > > > taken to imply that

Re: use heading like sectioning commands with USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE

2025-03-02 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:30:57AM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 01:00:30AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 10:05:49PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > This co

Re: use heading like sectioning commands with USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE

2025-03-02 Thread pertusus
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 09:48:26AM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 01:17:43PM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > > I propose that, if USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE is set, the > > > @*heading appearing after a @node be treated as much as possible > > > like a sectioning comm

Re: use heading like sectioning commands with USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 01:17:43PM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > I propose that, if USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE is set, the > > @*heading appearing after a @node be treated as much as possible > > like a sectioning command. > > What about HTML split mode? The question is where nodes woul

Re: use heading like sectioning commands with USE_NEXT_HEADING_FOR_LONE_NODE

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 01:00:30AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 10:05:49PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This comes from the thread on anchors, but I start a new thread to avoid > > > m

Re: normalization problem with `@anchor` targets

2025-03-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:57:40AM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 08:09:57PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > ADD_TRANSLITERATED_REDIRECTION_FILES would be fine. I guess it could be > > taken to imply that these are additional files that are being added. > > This is impleme