> From: Gavin Smith
> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 21:12:52 +0100
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:32:41PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > For example, if you go to the above URL, click on "Eglot" and select
> > the "one web page per node" variant, you end up here:
> >
> > ht
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:32:41PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Texinfo 7.0 changed the name of the directory where texi2any outputs
> split-HTML files for a manual:
>
> 7.0 (7 November 2022)
> * texi2any
> [...]
>. HTML output:
>. use manual_name_html as output directory for sp
Texinfo 7.0 changed the name of the directory where texi2any outputs
split-HTML files for a manual:
7.0 (7 November 2022)
* texi2any
[...]
. HTML output:
. use manual_name_html as output directory for split HTML instead of
manual_name or manual_name.html
This broke cross-
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:42:20PM +0200, Rudolf Adamkovič wrote:
> Alternatively, if references in titles cannot possibly be supported,
> then Texinfo should warn about them, instead of generating invalid HTML.
References inside section headings was discussed before and it seemed
that we were goi
Hello there!
I would like to report a bug when exporting
@node One
@unnumbered One
@dots{} content @dots{}
@node One and two
@unnumbered @ref{One} and two
@dots{} content @dots{}
to HTML.
Bug (1) In the table of contents:
Actual (nested links):
One
Patrice Dumas writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 09:23:57AM +0100, Daniel Cerqueira wrote:
>> The EPUB file is produced without any errors, and when I check to see if
>> the file is valid (using the `epubcheck` program) I get this 2 errors:
>
> My current view on EPUB conformance is tha
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 09:23:57AM +0100, Daniel Cerqueira wrote:
> The EPUB file is produced without any errors, and when I check to see if
> the file is valid (using the `epubcheck` program) I get this 2 errors:
My current view on EPUB conformance is that seems to be important to
have fu
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> This is your first contribution to Texinfo, isn't it?
(This wasn't address to me, makes me believe by mistake)
No. It Is also my last contribution.
Had other patches less important, but there is no point in sending them
upstream with the closed minds of some active Tex
