Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported

2024-03-06 Thread Bruno Haible
Gavin Smith wrote: > it is not worth changing and making practically every use of > @itemize in a Texinfo manual being flagged as incorrect, in my opinion. I agree. Counting the number of existing usages in Debian [1][2]: - 8753 times '@itemize @bullet' without braces, - 288 times '@itemize @b

Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported

2024-03-06 Thread Gavin Smith
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 10:45:54PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:44:33PM +, Gavin Smith wrote: > > I don't agree with changing the language to require braces. There is > > not a good reason to change it. Although writing "@itemize @bullet{}" > > may be more regular

Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported

2024-03-06 Thread Gavin Smith
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 03:05:06PM +0100, pertu...@free.fr wrote: > > I suggest > > > > ``` > > '@asis' needs braces here; say '@itemize @asis{}'. > > ``` > > I do not like much that option, because we do not have any idea why the > user ended up using '@itemize @asis'. Maybe with @asis, it will

Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported

2024-03-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I suggest >> >> ``` >> '@asis' needs braces here; say '@itemize @asis{}'. >> ``` > > I do not like much that option, because we do not have any idea why > the user ended up using '@itemize @asis'. Maybe with @asis, it will > be in general the case that @asis{} is correct, but with other > @

Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported

2024-03-06 Thread pertusus
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 01:32:16PM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Here is another proposal, which seems much clearer to me, but is > > probably too long: > > > @itemize command argument with omitted braces should not require an > > argument, but @asis does. Use braces for @asis > > I sugge

Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported

2024-03-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Here is another proposal, which seems much clearer to me, but is > probably too long: > @itemize command argument with omitted braces should not require an > argument, but @asis does. Use braces for @asis I suggest ``` '@asis' needs braces here; say '@itemize @asis{}'. ``` IMHO it is not

Re: @itemize @asis is not well supported

2024-03-06 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 05:37:25PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > The command after @itemize should not require an argument, but @asis > > > needs an argument. Try @asis{} instead. > > > The command after @itemize should not require an argument, but @code > > > needs