> 3. Type: M-x describe-key RET a RET (segfault)
Hey Gavin, I stole your fix and it seems to work here too:
--- a/info/infodoc.c
+++ b/info/infodoc.c
@@ -466,7 +466,8 @@
*k++ = keystroke;
*k = '\0';
- if (map[keystroke].value.function == NULL)
+ if (map[keystroke].value.
This goes against the practice of the vast majority of existing Texinfo
manuals, so this existing practice should be well supported.
Indeed. That is the crucial point. Those warnings are needed in well
over 99% of existing manuals, as far as I've seen :).
I think that it could be poss
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 06:45:06PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > That reply pertained to the case of a missing menu entry. Your case
> > is the opposite: a superfluous menu entry.
>
> To me, the manual with an entry leading to a node that do not
> corresponds to the sectioning structure is perf
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:16:06PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 04:57:15PM -0700, Karl Berry wrote:
> > I believe this is an intentional feature in recent Texinfo versions.
> > To get the warnings back, you need to run makeinfo with the
> > command-line option "-c
