Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2022-10-14 11:30:33 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2022-10-13 21:15:57 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
All of them are buggy:
* Concerning t4h,
@math{@var{base} \le 16},
yields "@varbase ≤
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2022-10-14 07:06:03 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
[...]
* mathjax is not compatible with text browsers.
Not a bug, working as designed.
Also broken design as there is no correct fallb
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2022-10-14 21:42:27 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
[...]
In your use case, you can avoid line breaks using the @w command:
@deftypefun int f4 ()
@w{@math{@var{n} = -2}}.
@end deftypefun
If the @w ignored in math mode?
[...]
For PDF output, I want the spaces to b
On 2022-10-14 20:52:38 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> Rendering mathematical notation in a text terminal can work well for
> very simple formulae but breaks down for more complex formulae, like
>
> J_v(z) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty }{{{\left(-1\right)^{k}\,\left(z\over
> 2\right)^{v+2\,k}
> }\over{k!\,\G
On 2022-10-14 21:42:27 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > FYI, the goal is to have @ttie{} equivalent to @tie{} except for
> > PDF output (where @tie{} also gives incorrect spacing).
>
> I see. As ever, using Texinfo commands inside @m
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 04:33:54PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Wikipedia has an article about kerning, but not with a good example
> of how ugly and disturbing the lack of kerning can be. I suggest
> that you look at
>
>
> https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/448069/fix-ugly-kerning-in-e
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> \input texinfo@c -*-texinfo-*-
>
> @macro ttie {}
> @end macro
>
> @deftypefun int f1 ()
> @math{@var{n}=-2}.
> @end deftypefun
>
> @deftypefun int f2 ()
> @math{@var{n}@ttie{}=@tti
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 07:06:04AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2022-10-13 21:15:57 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > I agree with Gavin, you should not use @math if you want normal text,
> > > but given that there is now good s
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:40:58AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> > I tested the page
> > https://mathjax.github.io/MathJax-demos-web/tex-chtml.html
> > with lynx (there are no Texinfo manuals with mathjax enabled I know of,
> > if anybody knows about one, please tell me), and the result seems good
>
On 2022-10-14 08:40:58 -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> For one example of a texinfo doc using Mathjax, see
> https://maxima.common-lisp.dev/. In particular, you can look at
> https://maxima.common-lisp.dev/docs/maxima_79.html. A maxima user (who
> might be blind?) says that the MathJax-enabled formul
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 7:02 AM Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * l2h generates image files as documented, which have many
> drawbacks
> > > > (do n
On 2022-10-14 16:08:59 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> I was probably unclear, I just wanted to add an information on
> ligatures, it was not related to kerning (I do not actually really
> know what kerning is...).
Wikipedia has an article about kerning, but not with a good example
of how ugly and d
On 2022-10-14 16:01:58 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * l2h generates image files as documented, which have many drawbacks
> > > > (do not wo
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 03:50:51PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > No, it is for all the @-commands, and, in my opinion, the sentence is
> > clear as is. But do not hesitate to propose changes in the manual if
> > you think it can be ameliorated.
>
> What I thought was that plain TeX was render
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > >
> > > * l2h generates image files as documented, which have many drawbacks
> > > (do not work with text browsers, not accessible, font size issues
> > >
On 2022-10-14 15:15:40 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2022-10-14 11:30:33 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > "In general, the contents of @math or @displaymath should be plain TeX
> > > only, with no interspersed Texinfo command
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-10-14 11:30:33 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > "In general, the contents of @math or @displaymath should be plain TeX
> > only, with no interspersed Texinfo commands."
>
> I assumed that this was for commands that exist in
On 2022-10-14 11:30:33 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2022-10-13 21:15:57 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > All of them are buggy:
> > * Concerning t4h,
> > @math{@var{base} \le 16},
> > yields "@varbase ≤ 16 ,", so @v
On 2022-10-14 07:06:03 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2022-10-13 21:15:57 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > I agree with Gavin, you should not use @math if you want normal text,
> > > but given that there is now good support of Te
On 2022-10-14 06:56:13 +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:20:24PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > is not true. More precisely, I would expect
> >
> > @macro ttie
> > @end macro
> >
> > to generate nothing, but inserting @ttie{} in a TeX expression
> > modifies the spacing in
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:40:08AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-10-13 21:15:57 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> All of them are buggy:
> * Concerning t4h,
> @math{@var{base} \le 16},
> yields "@varbase ≤ 16 ,", so @var doesn't work (while it is needed
> to ensure exactly the
21 matches
Mail list logo
