Ah, thanks. I see now that my m4 macro invocation was adding an extra line
because trailing whitespace of an arg is included as part of the arg. And
the offending code did this.
Really sorry for all of the trouble!
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 1:28 PM Gavin Smith
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 0
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 01:07:31PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
>
> I must be doing something wrong. This is what I have:
> ---
> The following relationships are true:
>
>
> @ifhtml
> @displaymath
> \eqalign{
> m &= k^2 \cr
> k &= \sin\alpha
> }
>
> @end displaymath
> @end ifhtml
> @ifinfo
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:07:50PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > I had thought that @code could be forced to be upright on
> > a slanted @def line, at least. Whether it should be upright everywhere
> > else doesn't really matter; we could go with what is the easiest to
> > implement. It's probabl
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Gavin Smith
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 09:07:20AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> > The manual isn't clear about what @displaymath does. I have something
> like
> >
> > @ifhtml
> > @displaymath
> > eqn
> > @end displaymath
> > @end ifhtml
> > @iftex
> > @display
Dear Gavin,
Thank you very much for the quick and precise answer. I am happy to say
that with the information you provided, we have set the flags properly and
now we are able to successfully install Texinfo. Thanks a lot again.
Cheers,
Raúl
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 10:58 AM Gavin Smith
wrote:
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 09:07:20AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> The manual isn't clear about what @displaymath does. I have something like
>
> @ifhtml
> @displaymath
> eqn
> @end displaymath
> @end ifhtml
> @iftex
> @displaymath
> eqn
> @end displaymath
> @end iftex
>
> The html version looks gre
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:51:11PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> I don't feel strongly about whether @t should force upright font. I'm
> happy if it is just @code. I will take the @t out if you haven't already.
Done.
> I had thought that @code could be forced to be upright on
> a slanted @def lin
The manual isn't clear about what @displaymath does. I have something like
@ifhtml
@displaymath
eqn
@end displaymath
@end ifhtml
@iftex
@displaymath
eqn
@end displaymath
@end iftex
The html version looks great with the eqn displayed as expected. But in
the pdf manual, there's an error about mis
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 8:53 AM Gavin Smith
wrote:
>
> You could also do
>
> > @ifhtml
> > @math{{\rm Ai}(x)} @c
> > @end ifhtml
> > @ifinfo
> > @math{Ai(x)} @c
> > @end ifinfo
> > @iftex
> > @math{{\rm Ai}(x)} @c
> > @end iftex
> > and
>
> although I don't know how easy this would be with your m
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 08:08:38AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 7:43 AM Raymond Toy wrote:
>
> >
> > This appears to produces good results but you would have to try it in
> >> your document to be sure. If you don't want an extra space to appear then
> >> you need to use
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:11:44PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > Should be do that, which means never have combinations? If we do that
> > > for those commands, it
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:24:13PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Should be do that, which means never have combinations? If we do that
> > for those commands, it would be logical to do it for other specific
> > indicatric @-commands,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Should be do that, which means never have combinations? If we do that
> > for those commands, it would be logical to do it for other specific
> > indicatric @-commands,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Should be do that, which means never have combinations? If we do that
> > for those commands, it would be logical to do it for other specific
> > indicatric @-commands,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 7:43 AM Raymond Toy wrote:
>
> This appears to produces good results but you would have to try it in
>> your document to be sure. If you don't want an extra space to appear then
>> you need to use
>>
>> @iftex
>> @math{{\rm Ai}(x)@c
>> @end iftex
>>
>> to comment out the
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 2:49 AM Gavin Smith
wrote:
> > If I do
> >
> > @inlinefmt{tex, {\rm Ai}(x)}
> >
> > The output is "\rm Ai(x)" in a normal roman font.
>
> A workaround is to use a block conditional instead:
>
> @iftex
> @math{{\rm Ai}(x)
> @end iftex
>
> This appears to produces good resul
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Should be do that, which means never have combinations? If we do that
> for those commands, it would be logical to do it for other specific
> indicatric @-commands, such as @option, @file, @env...? Combinations
> would only be possi
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:55:58AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> I'd like to do this, but just on the @def line, nowhere else.
I've nearly got this implemented and will soon commit.
Although that said, there are contexts that are "def-like" but do
not use a @def command. Here's an example from the
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:55:56AM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > Using \textrm doesn't work for code in @defn*, it does not make the font
> > upright, I guess, only roman. The solution that matches better with TeX
> > is to use \textnormal{\textsl{...}} for @var + remove the code style to
> > get
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 11:24:44PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:03:17AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > With the changes to TeX output, assuming it is more or less final, I
> > > check
> If I do
>
> @inlinefmt{tex, {\rm Ai}(x)}
>
> The output is "\rm Ai(x)" in a normal roman font.
A workaround is to use a block conditional instead:
@iftex
@math{{\rm Ai}(x)
@end iftex
This appears to produces good results but you would have to try it in
your document to be sure. If you don't
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 10:13:19PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> I think there is a big improvement now for the libc manual, HTML
> output. The attached clip1.png is from the current web documentation.
> clip2.png is generated with the development version of texi2any. Note
> that although there was @
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 11:24:44PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:03:17AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > With the changes to TeX output, assuming it is more or less final, I
> > checked the differences between LaTeX and TeX, the differences are
> > mainly at
23 matches
Mail list logo
