Hello,
Here is an hopefully correct patch. I did not do the punctuation
characters/special characters in the ASCII range, only the digits and
letters, as I have no idea which character is special or not.
There is still an error which looks like a kind of protection
against invalid input which is
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 11:40:43PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a patch. I did not do the punctuation characters/special
My patch is completly wrong... I'll redo it.
--
Pat
Hello,
Here is a patch. I did not do the punctuation characters/special
characters in the ASCII range, only the digits and letters, as
I have no idea which character is special or not.
There is still an error which looks like a kind of protection
against invalid input which is not correct anymor
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:47 AM Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:33:53AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> > It looks like texinfo 6.8 inserts:
> >
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
> >
> > at the beginning of each html file.
> >
> > In this day and age, shouldn't it be ju
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 09:42:52PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:17:02PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > TeX says that @U{0075}, which is supposed to be u is not supported:
> >
> > ./U0075.texi:9: Unicode character U+0075 not supported, sorry.
> > @U ...Uni
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 09:37:34PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> I've committed a fix for this. There are quite a few contexts for
> scanning in texinfo.tex that are all subtly different and a better
> fix might unify/reduce some of them.
In any case, it seems to fix my issue.
--
Pat
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:17:02PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TeX says that @U{0075}, which is supposed to be u is not supported:
>
> ./U0075.texi:9: Unicode character U+0075 not supported, sorry.
> @U ...Unicode character U+#1 not supported, sorry}
>
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 09:55:21PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following construct causes an error with texi2pdf
>
> @copying
> @}
> @end copying
>
>
> ./atchar_copying.texi:4: Argument of @docopying has an extra }.
>
> @par
>
>}
> l.4 @
Hello,
TeX says that @U{0075}, which is supposed to be u is not supported:
./U0075.texi:9: Unicode character U+0075 not supported, sorry.
@U ...Unicode character U+#1 not supported, sorry}
@fi @else @csname uni:#1@e...
l.9 @U{0075}
?
Hello,
The following construct causes an error with texi2pdf
@copying
@}
@end copying
./atchar_copying.texi:4: Argument of @docopying has an extra }.
@par
}
l.4 @}
--
Pat
atchar_copying.texi
Description: TeXInfo document
You can find a fairly up-to-date version here for the special functions:
https://maxima.common-lisp.dev/docs/maxima_77.html
It's a few days out of date but I'll be updating in the next few days with
the fixed html code. You might also look at the elliptic functions/
integrals, orthopoly section an
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:30:47AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 3:58 AM Gavin Smith
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:58:21PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> > > I'm getting a funny line break when displaying MathJax inline formulas on
> > > an html page. The TeX versi
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:33:53AM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> It looks like texinfo 6.8 inserts:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
>
> at the beginning of each html file.
>
> In this day and age, shouldn't it be just ? Or does texinfo
> html output really need that?
This should chan
It looks like texinfo 6.8 inserts:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
at the beginning of each html file.
In this day and age, shouldn't it be just ? Or does texinfo
html output really need that?
I'm not a web dev but a few times I wrote web pages, my old emacs would
insert the loose.dtd l
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 3:58 AM Gavin Smith
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:58:21PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> > I'm getting a funny line break when displaying MathJax inline formulas on
> > an html page. The TeX version doesn't have a line break.
> >
> > It's part of a much larger document
We still need to add documentation of the ePub output format to
the manual. Also, should there be an --epub option or should it be
--epub3 to give the version? Any insights?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:58:21PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> I'm getting a funny line break when displaying MathJax inline formulas on
> an html page. The TeX version doesn't have a line break.
>
> It's part of a much larger document from maxima, but the relevant part is
> given below. On the
17 matches
Mail list logo