Hello Gavin and Patrice,
>> `texi2html` had an option `--short-ref` [...]
>
> I had a look at the history and this customization never made to
> texi2any, however, previously if the reference was to a section,
> there was 'section'. This was removed in that commit
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:56:34PM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> `texi2html` had an option `--short-ref` that removed the word
> 'section' in link texts (version 1.82 had also the unfortunate side
> effect of removing tags like `...` from the link texts,
> but this is another story).
>
> Looki
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 04:56:34PM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> `texi2html` had an option `--short-ref` that removed the word
> 'section' in link texts (version 1.82 had also the unfortunate side
> effect of removing tags like `...` from the link texts,
> but this is another story).
>
> Looki
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 11:31:45AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:20:28PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> >
> > I think mark-none would be fine.
>
> Ok.
>
> > I saw no-bullet was being used in the current output; that would be okay
> > too. (See below.)
>
> I would prefer
`texi2html` had an option `--short-ref` that removed the word
'section' in link texts (version 1.82 had also the unfortunate side
effect of removing tags like `...` from the link texts,
but this is another story).
Looking up the current git's info pages for texinfo I couldn't find an
equivalent
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 20:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>> From: Jean-Christophe Helary
>> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 18:31:44 +0900
>> Cc: Werner LEMBERG ,
>> bug-texinfo@gnu.org
>>
I'd love to have a recommendation not to use tags that add arbitrary
English strings :-)
Unless there i
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary
> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 18:31:44 +0900
> Cc: Werner LEMBERG ,
> bug-texinfo@gnu.org
>
> >> I'd love to have a recommendation not to use tags that add arbitrary
> >> English strings :-)
> >> Unless there is a working (easy to use and well documented) mechanism to
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:20:28PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> I think mark-none would be fine.
Ok.
> I saw no-bullet was being used in the current output; that would be okay
> too. (See below.)
I would prefer to replace it with more semantic classes, but we will
see.
> But it doesn't matte
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 18:12, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>> From: Jean-Christophe Helary
>> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:27:18 +0900
>> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
>>
>> I'd love to have a recommendation not to use tags that add arbitrary English
>> strings :-)
>> Unless there is a working (easy to use a
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary
> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:27:18 +0900
> Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org
>
> I'd love to have a recommendation not to use tags that add arbitrary English
> strings :-)
> Unless there is a working (easy to use and well documented) mechanism to
> localize said strings.
???
> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2022 08:17:45 + (UTC)
> From: Werner LEMBERG
>
> The `@ref` command can tempt writers to express themselves in a
> manner that is suitable for a printed manual but looks awkward in
> the Info format. Bear in mind that your audience could be using
> both the printe
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 17:17, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>
>
> The documentation
> https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040pxref.html
> says:
>
> The effect of `@pxref{node-name}` is similar to that of `see
> @ref{node-name}`. However, in many circumstance the latte
The documentation
https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040pxref.html
says:
The effect of `@pxref{node-name}` is similar to that of `see
@ref{node-name}`. However, in many circumstance the latter is
preferrable, as this makes it clear in the Info output that the
13 matches
Mail list logo
