On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:37 PM Gavin Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:26:28PM -0700, Raymond Toy wrote:
> > Does this also mean I can use AMSTeX features in @math? I guess that
> also
> > means I still need @iftex and @ifhtml versions since tex output only
> > understands plain TeX, ri
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:54:12AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Please have a look at the attached files. Is it possible to fix the
> output of the current `texinfo.tex` version so that it gets
> right-justified as before? To be more precise, I would like that the
> formatting of the URL sta
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 4:05 PM
From: "Patrice Dumas"
To: "Christopher Dimech"
Cc: "Gavin Smith" , "Texinfo" ,
"Oliver Heimlich"
Subject: Re: MathJax support in texi2any
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:35:56PM +0200, Christopher Dimech wrote:
>
> The distinction between the variant of
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:35:56PM +0200, Christopher Dimech wrote:
>
>
> The distinction between the variant of Tex the user codes should
> remain.
>
>
>
> For plain tex, the command should remain "@tex @end tex". As
> Latex Syntax
>
> is much different, there should be some command like
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:34:30PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:56:40PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In commit e3955e2c725bed949b1aecb3f57afb66832db54e
> > * tp/tests/coverage_macro.texi: Remove some "@ifset texi2html"
> > conditions.
> > why were the @
The distinction between the variant of Tex the user codes should remain.
For plain tex, the command should remain "@tex @end tex". As Latex Syntax
is much different, there should be some command like "@latex @end latex".
Mxing creates too many problems to those making modifications. One
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:40:44AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> @display already means something unrelated to math, I would suggest not
> using it especially.
>
> > In fact, an alternative is to detect when there is input like
> >
> > @tex
> > $$a+b$$
> > @end tex
> >
> > and process this as di
Please have a look at the attached files. Is it possible to fix the
output of the current `texinfo.tex` version so that it gets
right-justified as before? To be more precise, I would like that the
formatting of the URL stays as-is, but the material before the URL
should be stretched more, at the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:34:30PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:56:40PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In commit e3955e2c725bed949b1aecb3f57afb66832db54e
> > * tp/tests/coverage_macro.texi: Remove some "@ifset texi2html"
> > conditions.
> > why were the @
