Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread sirgazil
El 2/04/19 a las 5:10 p. m., Per Bothner escribió: On 4/2/19 1:12 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: As far as I know GNOME’s Yelp is a frontend to different kinds of documentation and it does support Info files. That reads *info* files.  We're talking about reading *html* files. See Gavin's original m

Re: modernizing html output

2019-04-02 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Hello, Per Bothner writes: > On 1/28/19 12:05 PM, Gavin Smith wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 05:46:11PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote: >> >> diff --git a/js/info.js b/js/info.js >> index 10a2b1d..0175d35 100644 >> --- a/js/info.js >> +++ b/js/info.js >> @@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ >> if (linkid

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread Per Bothner
On 4/2/19 1:12 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: As far as I know GNOME’s Yelp is a frontend to different kinds of documentation and it does support Info files. That reads *info* files. We're talking about reading *html* files. See Gavin's original message for why we want to use html. -- --Per

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread George Clemmer
Hi Gavin, Gavin Smith writes: [...] > A manual with this interface added is at > https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo-html/Overview.html. > All the important keyboard commands that work in the Info viewers are > implemented, including index lookup. Nice! I like seeing Info command

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ludovic Courtès writes: > I hear the argument; it’s true that not everyone uses Emacs or is > familiar with the standalone Info reader. Rendering of Info manuals in > Emacs is not bad, but a modern browser can do a better job. > > Yet I’m not completely sold to the everything in the browser ap

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> I hear the argument; it’s true that not everyone uses Emacs or is >> familiar with the standalone Info reader. Rendering of Info manuals in >> Emacs is not bad, but a modern browser can do a better job. >> >> Yet I’m not completely sold to

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread Per Bothner
On 4/2/19 8:02 AM, Gavin Smith wrote: Using JavaScript within a web browser has big drawbacks due to its "sandboxed" nature. (You can't access environment variables, for example.) However, we'd want to avoid having to re-implement too much of the web browser; for example, input file parsing, te

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread Per Bothner
On 4/2/19 2:37 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Yet I’m not completely sold to the everything in the browser approach, and everything in JavaScript. In an ideal world (for me), we’d rather provide a local documentation viewer I don't think we're aiming for "everything in the browser". A closer app

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread Gavin Smith
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:37:51AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > (For some reason ‘i’ does open the index search box for me, but then > hitting enter doesn’t produce any effect. The other navigation commands > work fine, though.) It works on Firefox 53, at least. > Yet I’m not completely sold

Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?

2019-04-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Gavin, Gavin Smith skribis: > Documentation for GNU packages and others is often installed in the > Info format, a plain text format. Using a plaintext based format for > documentation does not take advantage of bitmapped displays that have > been available for decades. It does not allow