On 2016-02-15 11:07:00 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> (please keep Cc)
>
> it seems that info 6.1 lost the ability to dump the start page
> into an output file:
>
> $ info --output foobar coreutils
>
> properly dumps the coreutils page into foobar, but
>
> $ info --
Dear all,
(please keep Cc)
it seems that info 6.1 lost the ability to dump the start page
into an output file:
$ info --output foobar coreutils
properly dumps the coreutils page into foobar, but
$ info --output foobar
does *not* dump the dir/root node.
This breaks completion
On 12 February 2016 at 07:48, Per Bothner wrote:
> Browsers generally ignore tags they don't understand, so I believe
> there is no harm in using instead of , even for older
> browsers. However, this would need to be tested.
I don't like the idea even if it would work - I'd rather we output
val
On 9 February 2016 at 20:07, Per Bothner wrote:
> Using "id" makes sense when it is the name of a sub-tree, like a chapter
> or section, since it can be directly associated with an element that
> represents the subtree.
>
> Using is reasonable when it is the name of a *position*,
> as resulting
