> I guess we're talking about U+00A7, the section sign, \S in
> plain.tex?
Yes, and \P. Note, however, that both @S and @P work within a texinfo
document. It's just that texinfo.tex's \DeclareUnicodeCharacter for
`§' and `¶' (which use `\S' and `\P' for its definition) seem to be
modified, resu
Processing the attached document with luatex, I get
I guess we're talking about U+00A7, the section sign, \S in plain.tex?
I suppose something somewhere is overwriting that definition, and we
should \let the plain \S as some other longer name to avoid the problem.
(Plain LuaTeX itself does n
> §, ¶
Sigh. This should be
§, ¶
of course.
Werner
> Processing the attached document [...]
Oops! Apparently the wrong file encoding, so here's another try.
\input texinfo.tex
@documentencoding UTF-8
§, ¶
@bye
Processing the attached document with luatex, I get
! Undefined control sequence.
l.7 which assigns the symbols *, †, ‡, §
, ¶ to
It works just fine with pdtex. A bug?
Werner
\input texinfo.tex
@documentencoding UTF-8
§, ¶
@bye
On 30 December 2015 at 07:00, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Thanks, the old tests now all suceed here, but a new one fails:
> FAIL: test_scripts/coverage_formatting_utf8_enable_encoding.sh
Thanks, you must have run the long checks. I know why this is failing:
it's due to a difference between the resu
