come up with for a tick was the radical sign.
The lineless radical looks surprisingly ok to my eyes. I hadn't thought
of that. Sounds fine. The complication is that we're not currently
loading cmex at different sizes at all, so that will take some tweaking
a la cmmi to do it right. Althoug
On 30 September 2015 at 23:32, Quinn Grier wrote:
> @heading and friends are unaffected by @lowersections. One would expect
> the following to output Foo and Bar at the same sectioning level, as is
> the case without the @lowersections command:
>
> \input texinfo
> @setfilename test.in
On 2 October 2015 at 23:29, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
> Please note that my definition of 2713 is wrong, because I couldn't
> figure out how to produce a check mark in Tex.
It depends on what glyphs are available in the fonts. The best I could
come up with for a tick was the radical sign.
test.dvi
On 2 October 2015 at 07:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:14:17 GMT
>> From: Karl Berry
>>
>> I find the File: and Node: parts of the hdr line the most useful.
>> At least Node:, for sure, much more than the pointers. Go figure ...
>
> Actually, the "File:" and "Node:" parts a
