Hi Karl.
> So, Texinfo @parts do not map to Docbook. Not surprising. Such is
> life. To get parts in your Docbook output, all I can think of is the
> useless "hack it in by hand" approach (e.g., throw comments into the
> source and post-process them to create the necessary /related
> elements).
Hi Arnold,
So, Texinfo @parts do not map to Docbook. Not surprising. Such is
life. To get parts in your Docbook output, all I can think of is the
useless "hack it in by hand" approach (e.g., throw comments into the
source and post-process them to create the necessary /related
elements). Sorry.
Hi.
The @part command is somewhat mismatched with how docbook works. In
particular, parts include chapters, so for correct generation of the
docbook tags, we should really have
@part
@parttitle Title Of The Part Here
@chapter ...
@chapter ...
@end part
