On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:35:33PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
> It looks at
> ('eps', 'gif', 'jpg', 'jpeg', 'pdf', 'png', 'svg');
>
> HTML output, there's no real use in linking to an eps or a pdf as an
> image in html output, is there? Browsers will not render them as an
> image within
It looks at
('eps', 'gif', 'jpg', 'jpeg', 'pdf', 'png', 'svg');
HTML output, there's no real use in linking to an eps or a pdf as an
image in html output, is there? Browsers will not render them as an
image within the page (at least not that I've ever seen), which is what
is desired.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:15:38AM +, John Darrington wrote:
>
> Did you try running the test case I sent?
It passed (testing in-source in tp/ using ./texi2any.pl).
--
Pat
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:57:37AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:43:40PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> With this flag, it warns that picture.txt is missing, even though
> it's not. In fact, it shouldn't be looking for that, but for
> pi
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:43:40PM -0800, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> With this flag, it warns that picture.txt is missing, even though
> it's not. In fact, it shouldn't be looking for that, but for
> picture.{png,jpg}.
>
> Patrice, are you looking for the "html" image formats for docbook
