On Aug 17 2018, Mark Galeck wrote:
> For this Makefile:
>
> ROOT := ${shell echo
> /home/mgaleck/ws/mgaleck_build/mgaleck_build_refactor2/target | sed s/t/t/}
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH := ${ROOT}/usr/lib64:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
>
> foobar:
> touch $@
>
>
> and file foobar missing, then on som
Update of bug #54529 (project make):
Status:None => Not A Bug
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #4:
This message:
$ make
Then why does the error say "make: ***" ? Shouldn't Make be more robust and
assertive in such a case, if a child crashes, to inform the user that it is not
Make code?
From: Andreas Schwab
To: Mark Galeck ; psm...@gnu.org;
bo...@kolpackov.net; bug-make@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, August 2
No problem, thank you for explaining. I still think that Make if it invokes a
program directly, and the program crashes, Make should say something that will
help the user understand it is not Make bug. There has to be a way to print a
more informative error message.
Does the error message as
