Re: Regression caused by Commit: 5bd7ad2b225b ("Preserve the real value of -jN in MAKEFLAGS using jobserver.")

2017-11-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 12:27 +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > Actually... > A few times when building the linux kernel I've received the message > > make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add '+' to > parent make rule. > > This isn't consistent so it is presumably only when some particular

Re: output-sync test failure

2017-11-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 11:44 +, Earnestly wrote: > Is this a genuine test failure or was this unintended? I'm not quite sure how to answer that question: definitely I didn't intend the test to fail :). And in fact, it doesn't fail for me. I couldn't find anything that used the ".wait" option

Re: output-sync test failure

2017-11-03 Thread Earnestly
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:50:50AM -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > I'm not quite sure how to answer that question: definitely I didn't > intend the test to fail :). Ah sorry, I meant this in regards to whether the test was functioning correctly and detecting a genuine error in make or if the test was i

accessing $@ internally to make

2017-11-03 Thread David Boyce
My company uses a third-party patch set which enhances GNU make for distributed builds. There are many approaches to distributing builds and this is just one but I believe the problem described here is general to all distributed build models. Distributed builds, naturally, must occur in NFS which