Hello,
Thank you for your email.
on the 29/10/03 00:03, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jg> Could the signals and errors that Make displays include the text
jg> description of them? The same way that other programs do not
jg> return the errno.h value, but th
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jg> ok, I've cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], so maybe someone can tell me if
jg> signal numbers are decoded. Would you include this internally? or
jg> use a lib etc?
We use the system service to translate the code if the system provides
it (many UNIX systems
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:07:39 +
> From: "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ok, I've cc [EMAIL PROTECTED], so maybe someone can tell me if signal
> numbers are decoded. Would you include this internally? or use a lib etc?
The signal names are decoded if the underlying library supports th
Hello,
What port of Make, specifically, do you use?
Hello, I am using a native win32 build I created of 3.80.
Kind regards
JG
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Hello,
We use the system service to translate the code if the system provides
it (many UNIX systems provide strsignal() for example). If not we have
a predefined set of signals we translate, but if the signal is not a
member of that predefined list it's not translated.
ok, I wonder if win32 has e
J. Grant wrote:
Hello,
We use the system service to translate the code if the system provides
it (many UNIX systems provide strsignal() for example). If not we have
a predefined set of signals we translate, but if the signal is not a
member of that predefined list it's not translated.
ok, I won
Hi Earnie,
ok, I wonder if win32 has extra signals, this code 127, could these be
supported for win32 ports?
#define SIGINT 2 /* Interactive attention */
#define SIGILL 4 /* Illegal instruction */
#define SIGFPE 8 /* Floating point error */
#define SI
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:02:55 +
> From: "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I noticed on this list list they talk about it being a failed exec:
>
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg00674.html
I doubt if this is a signal. It's more probably an error code from a
library function
