> $(EXEC-FILE): $(SRCS:%.o=%.mod)
I think you mean $(SRCS:%.mod=%.o)
Eddy.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Martin Dorey wrote:
> > define assert
> > $(call assert,$($ARGS), The variable "$ARGS" is null)
> > endef
>
> This code is dead - nothing calls it. I see that it includes an
> expression that will be evaluated (if it's ever called) as $(A)RGS
> when it was probably intended t
e
itself, not for bugs in makefiles. I believe there's a help-make list for that.
-Original Message-
From: bug-make-bounces+mdorey=bluearc@gnu.org
[mailto:bug-make-bounces+mdorey=bluearc@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Duke Normandin
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 15:21
To: Paul Smit
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:08 -0600, Duke Normandin wrote:
> > %.o:%.mod
> >$(MODULA) %<
>
> This should be "$<", not "%<".
I should use my "good eye" when I program and debug! Thanks for
catching that. Unfortunately fixing the typo didn't solve the
prob
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:08 -0600, Duke Normandin wrote:
> %.o:%.mod
>$(MODULA) %<
This should be "$<", not "%<".
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Hello list...
I recently cobbled together a "generic" Makefile for an Oberon-2
compiler - with the help of 2 generous hackers on this list. Works
great with Oberon.
Today I tried the same Makefile with a Modula-2 compiler, after making
the necessary changes. The Modula compiler is really a gcc
fr
