On 02/07/11 22:38, Alan Curry wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= writes:
>>
>> Given the above setsid make example (which hangs for 10s
>> ignoring Ctrl-C, I'm leaning towards `make` needing to
>> be more shell like, or at least forward the SIGINT etc.
>> to the job, and not assume jobs run
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= writes:
>
> Given the above setsid make example (which hangs for 10s
> ignoring Ctrl-C, I'm leaning towards `make` needing to
> be more shell like, or at least forward the SIGINT etc.
> to the job, and not assume jobs run in the foreground group).
I'm a little wor
On 29/06/11 10:55, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 28/06/11 20:10, Alan Curry wrote:
>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= writes:
>>>
>>> I'm still not convinced we need to be messing with tcsetpgrp()
>>> but you're right in that the disconnect between the timeout
>>> process group and that of whatever st
