Re: Suffix rules with dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Paul Smith skribis: > On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:48 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> In this thread: >> >>http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-September/006453.html >> >> and specifically in this message and its followups: >> >> http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2

Re: Suffix rules with dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Paul Smith > Cc: l...@gnu.org, bug-make@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:11:25 -0400 > > > there's evidence that GNU Make no longer treats suffix rules with > > prerequisites "as normal files with funny names", as described in the > > manual. > > > > Did the behavior indeed change, an

Re: Suffix rules with dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 08:48 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > In this thread: > >http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-September/006453.html > > and specifically in this message and its followups: > > http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-September/006460.html > >

Suffix rules with dependencies

2013-09-15 Thread Eli Zaretskii
In this thread: http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-September/006453.html and specifically in this message and its followups: http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-September/006460.html there's evidence that GNU Make no longer treats suffix rules with prerequi