%% "Bhatt, Milan C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bmc> Because tcsh wasn't fully POSIX compliant, it could not properly
bmc> establish a pipe for communication between the sub-make processes
bmc> leading to gmake complaining that the "job sever" wasn't
bmc> available.
Wow. I'm really surp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bhatt, Milan C
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 3:44 PM
> To: 'Paul D. Smith'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Recursive GMAKE with -j option
>
>
> I just figured out the issue I was having with doing
ut I'm not
too sure about how POSIX compliant it is.
Thanks,
Milan
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Bhatt, Milan C
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Recursive GMAKE with -j option
%% "Bhatt
%% "Bhatt, Milan C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bmc> I get the following message:
bmc> warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make rule
See the GNU make manual section on parallel builds and the section
on error messages for a description of what this means.
If t
Hello,
Has anyone run into
problems when performing recursive GMAKE AND specifying the -j option?
I've noticed that there are no problems with the following:
gmake
-j
when you're doing
recursive gmake. But I run into problems when I specify an integer value
for the -j option:
gmak
