%% Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> I guess I still don't understand Dan's comment, though.
dj> Well for me, make calling several make&'s all in the same
dj> directory,
I wrote a long reply to this. Then I rewrote it. Then I decided to
delete most of it :). I've left some
Paul> I guess I still don't understand Dan's comment, though.
Well for me, make calling several make&'s all in the same directory, I
see lots of messages about how they are entering and leaving that
directory, when in fact they never set foot outside that directory,
and what they really were tryin
%% Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> %% Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> dj> The messages on submakes aren't perfect.
> dj> make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp'
> dj> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp'
> dj> You mean "starting submake 1" and especially "ending submake[1]
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:44:48AM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> dj> The messages on submakes aren't perfect.
> dj> make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp'
> dj> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp'
> dj> You mean "starting submake 1" and especially
%% Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
dj> The messages on submakes aren't perfect.
dj> make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp'
dj> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp'
dj> You mean "starting submake 1" and especially "ending submake[1]".
I don't understand your comment.
dj> In fact, if o
