> If you're going to
> insist
Insisting on nothing. Just have no way to do so.
> that people make assumption about your setup because you aren't
> interested in describing it, then expect misleading answers.
Certainly there will always be such a risk. The matter is how much.
Certainly operatin
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Ilya N. Golubev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> expend the effort to do so
>
> This tries to represent things as if some terrible effort is required.
> Generally it is not so.
Oddly enough, that's not my experience. When someone doesn't provide
enough data, the
> No one is getting paid,
Unfortunately, the attitude, once established here, nearly inevitably
spreads to other situations, even exactly those of paid "support". It
would be nice to be able to nuke it in all assigned to paid support,
to automatically force everybody manifesting it to go back to
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 23:50 +0400, Ilya N. Golubev wrote:
> This may seem justified, and is at least understandable. And
> complying with all of this takes in most cases even more work than
> isolating (and even possibly fixing) the bug entirely on one's own.
> So the posting becomes pointless.
Y
