On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 13:10 +, Durig, Burak W wrote:
> I have an A 12 based emulator I want to run, I’m following a guide
> and I’m stuck at creating the below:
> $ x86_64_ranchu_defconfig
> The error I keep seeing is that the default configuration can’t be
> found. I can type x86_64_defcibfu
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:04 AM LeJacq, Jean Pierre
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 10:51:42 AM EST Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > (Makefile begin)-
> > .PHONY: all
> > all: foo.x foo.z
> >
> > %.x %.z:
> > touch $@
> > -(Makefile end)--
> >
On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 10:51:42 AM EST Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> (Makefile begin)-
> .PHONY: all
> all: foo.x foo.z
>
> %.x %.z:
> touch $@
> -(Makefile end)--
>
> $ rm foo*
> $ make
> touch foo.x
> $ make
> touch foo.z
> $ make
> make: Not
Minimal example:
$ cat makefile
$(shell rm -rf /tmp/blah)
$(shell mkdir -p /tmp/blah)
ASDF = $(info $1 $(wildcard /tmp/blah/*)
$(if ${BLAH},$(info before $(wildcard /tmp/blah/*)))
$(shell touch /tmp/blah/{a,b,c}.txt)
$(info after $(wildcard /tmp/blah/*.txt))
$ make --version
GNU Make 4.1
...snip.
On Jan 16 2018, Paul Smith wrote:
> The automake generated makefiles know how to rebuild Makefile.in,
> Makefile, configure, etc. based on the out-of-date-ness of the base
> files such as configure.ac and Makefile.am. So if those files are
> updated, then the makefile will attempt to re-run thos
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
> I think if you really wanted to pursue this, it might be worthwhile
> creating a little script that updated the timestamps on all files to
> still have their relative timestamp relationship, but just newer. For
> example you could sort all th
On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 09:13 -0800, David Boyce wrote:
> It looks like the touching not only destroys incremental build
> capability (expected and not an issue) but toggles the makefile into
> "developer mode".
>
> I'm not looking for any changes here, just wondering whether anyone
> knows which fi
Excuse-mois, je ne parle pas le Francais bien mais si je vous comprend bien
vous avez utilisait l'option avec make mais ca c'est un option de f77.
Peut etre vous pouvez taper:
make FFLAGS="--N ftrap=common"
Bonne chance,
Tim
2016-12-28 9:44 GMT+00:00 rania rais :
> Bonjour,
>
>
> j'aimerais
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Tom Varga wrote:
> b.zoo1 really only depends on b.bar1
> b.zoo2 really only depends on b.bar2
>
> However, only one rule (and tool) is used to build both b.bar1 and b.bar2
>
> I really don't want force b.zoo1 to artificially depend on b.bar2 as it's
> not a real
I guess this bug is pretty much what I'm dealing with.
However, it also exhibits itself even when not using pattern rules. ie :
b.foo :
touch b.foo
b.bar1 b.bar2 : b.foo
touch b.bar1
touch b.bar2
b.zoo1 : b.bar1
touch b.zoo1
b.zoo2 : b.bar2
touch b.zoo2
The
b.zoo1 really only depends on b.bar1
b.zoo2 really only depends on b.bar2
However, only one rule (and tool) is used to build both b.bar1 and b.bar2
I really don't want force b.zoo1 to artificially depend on b.bar2 as it's
not a real dependency.
I was really just hoping to be able to convince gnu
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Tom Varga wrote:
>
> On page 120 of the gnumake manual, it mentions support for pattern
> rules with multiple targets.
>
> This pattern rule has two targets:
> %.tab.c %.tab.h: %.y
> bison -d $<
>
> So, if I have a simple rule that looks like:
>
> %.bar1 %.bar2 :
> From: Oleksandr Gavenko
> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:17:17 +0200
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, help-m...@gnu.org
>
> On 2013-01-12, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:57:28 -0800
> >> From: David Boyce
> >> Cc: help-make , bug-make
> >>
> >> % make -j2
> >> sleep 3
> >> while ec
On 2013-01-10, jungsoo.son wrote:
> I always run 'make' with -j8. In this case, when there are a fail it is too
> hard to check the fail.
>
> I want to kill the all sub-make process immediately when the error occurred.
>
> How can i stop build immediately in build fail?
>
I make such example:
.P
On 2013-01-12, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:57:28 -0800
>> From: David Boyce
>> Cc: help-make , bug-make
>>
>> % make -j2
>> sleep 3
>> while echo ok; do sleep 1; done
>> ok
>> ok
>> ok
>> ok
>> exit 1
>> stopping make!
>> make: *** [job2] Terminated
>> make: *** [job1] Ter
On 2013-01-10, jungsoo.son wrote:
How can i stop build immediately in build fail?
There is a patch already for this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2009-01/msg00035.html
And an example of how it works:
http://ninjaverification.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/continous-integration-system-u
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:57:28 -0800
> From: David Boyce
> Cc: help-make , bug-make
>
> % make -j2
> sleep 3
> while echo ok; do sleep 1; done
> ok
> ok
> ok
> ok
> exit 1
> stopping make!
> make: *** [job2] Terminated
> make: *** [job1] Terminated
> Terminated
Which is dangerous, since when
It may be a reasonable feature request but it also may not be that
hard to implement with existing functionality. Here's one approach:
% cat makefile
SHELL := $(abspath shx)
.PHONY: job
job: job1 job2
.PHONY: job1
job1:
sleep 3
exit 1
.PHONY: job2
job2:
while echo ok; do
%% Kamini Prajapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
kp> I am working on TinyOS project.
kp> Recently I upgraded my system with the following Patches.
kp> Previously when I compile any Application, it used to show me the
kp> RAM and ROM information. But after the upgrade, it doesn't show
k
%% "Kowalski, Dennis M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
kdm> I am using GNU make 3.79.1 on a Sun Solaris box.
I think there is some confusion here.
kdm> I have a dot h file that has includes in it.
kdm> i.e.
kdm> a.h
kdm>#include b.h
kdm> I have a new b.h in the NODE1 include di
%% "Wagner, Phillip W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wpw> 1. While using the -win32 shell how does one correctly expand an
wpw>environment variable for usage on the command line. The
wpw>%DOS_VARIABLE% doesn't always expand when executing a command.
wpw>It appears to still be
%% "Margalit, Sivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ms> I have a problem to define variable assignment per target.
With any question, request for help, or bug report, please always
include the version of GNU make you're using and the operating system
(and version) you're using it on.
This actual
%% "John Jamulla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jj> I can't seem to find a newsgroup or forum somewhere to ask a
jj> complex gmake question.
jj> Can you give me an idea where I could ask some questions?
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
news:gnu.utils.help
news:gnu.utils.bug
HTH.
--
---
%% Duane Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
de> [~> make -v
de> GNU Make version 3.77, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath.
de> Under SunOS 4 make, we can do this:
de> foo.lst + foo.o: foo.s
de> my_assembler -l foo.lst -o foo.o foo.s
de> Key point is: "target *PLUS* target" Thi
24 matches
Mail list logo
